Jump to content
SAU Community

Pod Box....Really..WhY?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

UAS has two boxes to encapsulate your pod. There is one made of fibreglass for $195 and for ultra wank :whackit: they have carbon fibre one aswell.

Look in "parts and accessories " -> "Skylines" -> "Engine Clutch And Gearbox Components"

http://www.uniqueautosports.com.au/

OR

You can just make your own turbo partition like they have on the above site aswell.

I cant believe people dont know about this. I am thinking of setting up a web site with photos of the way i installed my front mount intercooler, pod filter, etc and the little things that go with it all like thermal wrapping the dump and partitioning the pod filter, how to pipe the intercooler, cold air feed, etc because not enough people are doing this.

At the moment i am toying with the idea of installing some cosworth vents in the bonnet (facing backwards close to the back of the bonnet) because of the tremendous amount of heat trapped under the hood. The problem is of course making it so that water wont drip onto essential components under normal conditions. If anyone out there has suggestions for more subtle and as effective vents to stick in the hood i am all ears. Note anyone that tries to suggest something like mounting a subaru bonnet scoop will be hunted down and shot......

Again for the people who dont remember physics "HOT AIR RISES" and with no where for it to go under the hood it will simply soak into your engine ie "HEAT SOAK" as a result you may get pinging and your car wont perform as well because the intake charge is heated by every component of the engine before it reaches the combustion chamber

:)

R33NT:

You have raised some good points. For a n00bie .... what sort of instruments could I get that tell me temperatures of certain components?

I'm not a fan of 'gauges' so I'd prefer a digital screen/readout.

What components should I be keeping an eye on ?

Im all for maximising power out of my current engine setup and I know that like the pod airbox giving a cold air intake keeping engine temperatures at a decent level will also increase performance/life of an engine.

I had looked at raising the bonnet but i didnt like that idea because it would mean the firewall would get drenched every storm we had. I know the engine bay is water proof to some extent but i dont like the idea of pouring bulk water over an area of the engine bay that wasnt designed for that. Note we get serious storms up here in the NT, the storm usually last 4 months and it is called the monsoon.

Carbon fibre bonnet! to much of the ol' :whackit:

Benm i may be a newbie to this forum but i have had my GTS25t for over 3 years and i am an Engineer (bought it when i finished my degree's). As such i crave all the knowledge i can manage about my car and i have had 3 years to do it. Anyway i stumbled across this forum by accident when looking at a link from skylinesdownunder.

I am usually on the ford performance forum (nick = skyline) annoying everyone there. I took an XR6t for a test drive a while back and went on the above forum and gave it a rough review. It was hilarious to see how many people responded asking why nobody had criticised it before. Below is a link to my finest hour.

http://64.4.22.250/cgi-bin/linkrd?_lang=EN...ncefalconsforum

I would have thought a box would be best. because otherwise you are relying on the top of the bonnet to seal the top part of the partition.

Benm as for gauges i only use the stock gauges with a small HKS boost gauge (came with the car) mounted under my head unit. I had thought of getting a pillar mount twin gauge type setup which would house my boost gauge and one of those autometer air fuel ratio meters. You will find that a humans are better at reading a gauge at a glance then reading a digital display using something like 7 segment readout.

Jay95R33 do you have templates for your box?? If so could you email them to me at

[email protected]

Thanks

Originally posted by R33NT

Jay95R33 do you have templates for your box?? If so could you email them to me at

[email protected]

Thanks

Yepp no worries.

I've got the templates at work in Word and JPG format. I'll email it out to anyone that want's it on Monday :uh-huh:

J

a31_cefiro: I have that issue thanks anyway. i have read it a few times and will probably do something similar! Do you haapen to have the first installment of the 34 project? I have all of the others except for the very first one! very useful info for me...

R33NT: dude, read my earlier post, i already know that the pipe can collapse and why...i have bought a pod but want to make / buy a cold air box for it before i use it, i have read the article and also will be changing the ribbed condom in due course - similar to the hpi 34 project car. Oh yeah and i like the pod noise but its TOO loud, i dont want that much attention, and changing gears less than 2000rpm just to keep it quiet is not my idea of driving :D

Hi guys, I use the $40 digital temperature probes and displays from Jaycar for doing this sort of stuff on road cars. I have one in the cold air box, one on the compressor outlet and one just before the throttle body. The passenger reads and writes down the numbers for review later.

You could do it with one and move it around, that would cost less but be a little less convenient.

On the race cars we use the temperature probes on the Pi or Motec data logging system. No passenger required.

We have found no real temperature differences between having a lid and not having one when the car is moving. When stationary the lid does make a bit (not a lot) of difference but as soon as the car moves and air flows in through the vent and pipework the temperature returns to ambient.

Hope that adds to the discussion.

Originally posted by Sydneykid

Hi guys, I use the $40 digital temperature probes and displays from Jaycar for doing this sort of stuff on road cars.  I have one in the cold air box, one on the compressor outlet and one just before the throttle body.

I've got one of those too. Thy seem pretty good for the $$$$.

Just wondering how you go when using them, cause the lead to the probe isn't long enough to bring the display into the cabin.. Do you just leave it outside???

Also, when you mount it in, do you just wedge it under one of the pipes and crap it up tight??? I was always paranoid of doing it this way !!

J

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...