Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

lol sorry man this i really dissagree P4 3.4 2mb cache is no way near on par with 3200+ try a 3700+

P4 will do encoding and office stuff better 3700+ will do 3dmark and games better

both PC must be running simular hardware like same hdd same amount of ram and most importantly same gfx card

Getting 2 laptops for the old cronies at work.

they have just started using pc's, lol

which one would be your choice on a 2k budget, each? Ive recommended Asus, in particular the F3JP over the V6J but Im not with it in regards to laptops (never used one) and core duo etc.

http://www.asuslaptop.com.au/asus-notebook-special-deals.php

or

http://www.eyo.com.au/prod_P-V6J-P_proddes...1181806S1G.html

sweet :)

Apparently the 4600+ dual core is equivalent to 2 x 3800+ single cores, so even while not utilising the extra grunt available from the second core, it should be 20% faster.

Really the only time I need more power than I have now is when I'm encoding video, and doing things while playing a game at the same time - this is why I chose the dual core 4600+ over the FX-55 single core I could have purchased for a similar price.

Just a cpu upgrade - already running 2048Mb ram.

Final specs will be:

AMD A64 X2 4600+ (S939)

ASUS A8N-E MOBO

2048Mb RAM (4x512 DDR400)

XFX 7900GT (PCI-E)

800Gb storage (160+320 internal, 320 external in MediaGate)

Viewsonic VX2025WM

Hopefully the only thing I'll have to change in the next 18 months is to add some more storage as it begins to fill up.

I've just gone halves in a webserver that we're building for co-located hosting... check it out :P 8x3ghz and about 16gb of memory.

Processor #1 Vendor: GenuineIntel

Processor #1 Name: Intel® Xeon CPU

3.00GHz

Processor #1 speed: 2993.411 MHz

Processor #1 cache size: 2048 KB

Processor #2 Vendor: GenuineIntel

Processor #2 Name: Intel® Xeon CPU 3.00GHz

Processor #2 speed: 2993.411 MHz

Processor #2 cache size: 2048 KB

Processor #3 Vendor: GenuineIntel

Processor #3 Name: Intel® Xeon CPU 3.00GHz

Processor #3 speed: 2993.411 MHz

Processor #3 cache size: 2048 KB

Processor #4 Vendor: GenuineIntel

Processor #4 Name: Intel® Xeon CPU

3.00GHz

Processor #4 speed: 2993.411 MHz

Processor #4 cache size: 2048 KB

Processor #5 Vendor: GenuineIntel

Processor #5 Name: Intel® Xeon CPU 3.00GHz

Processor #5 speed: 2993.411 MHz

Processor #5 cache size: 2048 KB

Processor #6 Vendor: GenuineIntel

Processor #6 Name: Intel® Xeon CPU 3.00GHz

Processor #6 speed: 2993.411 MHz

Processor #6 cache size: 2048 KB

Processor #7 Vendor: GenuineIntel

Processor #7 Name: Intel® Xeon CPU

3.00GHz

Processor #7 speed: 2993.411 MHz

Processor #7 cache size: 2048 KB

Processor #8 Vendor: GenuineIntel

Processor #8 Name: Intel® Xeon CPU 3.00GHz

Processor #8 speed: 2993.411 MHz

Processor #8 cache size: 2048 KB

If you're after quality website hosting contact me! :D

Asus more reliable than Toshiba? Care to elaborate on that comment?

I know nothing about laptops. Nothing. Do Toshiba make their own components?

I simply figure seeing that Asus manufacture top motherboards and videocards (that cant be argued) then a laptop from Asus should be good quality.

Budget was originally $1500. Then one of the bosses suggested he wanted core duo (let me point out that the 2 bosses have never used a computer in their life until the past couple of months), so I upped the budget to 2grand to accomodate this. My suggestion was sata HD, 1gig ram, min 1.6ghz, etc, and I havent seen a new Toshiba with those specs for under 2k.

Cheers anyways, but Ive decided to get them the Asus F3JP, something that will last these 2 minimal users a good 5yrs or so. All they will be doing is word/exel & emails for work, rarely ;) , and internet browsing & maybe using the laptop with a tv tuner down the track.

Are Assus considered to be un-reliable ? :)

meh, Im not concerned either way, 18more hours until my surgery, is the biggest worry on my mind.

Brendan

Budget was originally $1500. Then one of the bosses suggested he wanted core duo (let me point out that the 2 bosses have never used a computer in their life until the past couple of months), so I upped the budget to 2grand to accomodate this. My suggestion was sata HD, 1gig ram, min 1.6ghz, etc, and I havent seen a new Toshiba with those specs for under 2k.

Toshiba do tend to be a tad more expensive than some but they really are top quality laptops.

Asus should be ok, its not like its an Acer. :S

Its just that Toshiba are well known as a reliable business laptop.

I know nothing about laptops. Nothing. Do Toshiba make their own components?

I simply figure seeing that Asus manufacture top motherboards and videocards (that cant be argued) then a laptop from Asus should be good quality.

Toshiba make their own chassis's just like Asus do. There was a time when Asus made chassis, then sent them to local retailers to assemble. I had built quite a number of Asus laptops, and found them better than your run of the mill non-branded chassis, but the top shelf stuff has always been IBM/Toshiba who do all their building in-house.

It's only recently that prices of IBM (Lenova) and Toshiba laptops have come down. Up until this year, sub-1000 dollar Toshiba laptops were unheard of.

I'd go for Toshiba personally, but i'm not a huge fan of their design. Recently i've been purchasing Dell laptops for our workplace, who has slowly migrated from Toshiba laptops. I've had no problems with Dell so far, and their top end lightweight gear is actually pretty bloody awesome, so much so i'm considering buying one for myself.

meh, Im not concerned either way, 18more hours until my surgery, is the biggest worry on my mind.

All the best with that mate.

All the best with that mate.

Cheers Howie.

lol, I expect to be using my PC a fair bit over the next 4 weeks during recovery; go BF2.

might try overclocking the unit (p4 3.4, gigabyte mobo, 2gig ram, 7800gtx, raid 400mb sata HD, 9 fans) to 4000, havent gone past 3700 (8%) as yet but its been real stable and heat hasnt been a real issue

:)

Just a cpu upgrade - already running 2048Mb ram.

Final specs will be:

AMD A64 X2 4600+ (S939)

ASUS A8N-E MOBO

2048Mb RAM (4x512 DDR400)

XFX 7900GT (PCI-E)

800Gb storage (160+320 internal, 320 external in MediaGate)

Viewsonic VX2025WM

Hopefully the only thing I'll have to change in the next 18 months is to add some more storage as it begins to fill up.

lol at 800gb. :(

I run a 120gb thats happily 60% full. 8gb worth of family pics, almost 2gb of car related pics, a few bits of software and a couple of games (BF2)

I throw everything off to DVD and store it away, have a nice little program I slapped together to help me trace down what I need at a later date. Tends to be a bit of a habit I have now after loosing a few WD drives one after another (3-9months between failures) a few years back. This was back before the JB drives.

What ISP are you with?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...