Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey

just wondering, this may sound like the most stupidest question..but

i bought an acer 4070 laptop, its got 2ghz processor, 1 gb ram, 100gb hard drive...etc.etc

is there any way i can upgrade everything in the future? like ram and harddrive? I use it for CAD and INVENTOR and general internet stuff, inventor give it a run for its money....it still copes very well but in the future i may want more...

so yea simple question....can i upgrade this like a normal desktop computer?

lmao yes.. 3/4" were the small bastards. :huh:

sorry to do this again 3 1/4"

hey

just wondering, this may sound like the most stupidest question..but

i bought an acer 4070 laptop, its got 2ghz processor, 1 gb ram, 100gb hard drive...etc.etc

is there any way i can upgrade everything in the future? like ram and harddrive? I use it for CAD and INVENTOR and general internet stuff, inventor give it a run for its money....it still copes very well but in the future i may want more...

so yea simple question....can i upgrade this like a normal desktop computer?

yes but if your laptop is under warranty i highly suggest not touching it

Anyone here tried Vista yet, and had it not work at all?

I cant even seem to get it into windows after finishing the setup it throws up the blue screen then reboots saying "Installation incomplete. Please reinstall"

Ive tried a fresh format install, as well as the upgrade from within windows....both shit it and wont run.

Funny thing is i can get vista running fine via VMware...

wtf is going on....

lol I've had it install on an 4.5yr old Nforce 2 AMD computer and it runs perfectly fine. :kiss:

Good thing for the 30day Vista Install trial. :O Wouldn't that just piss you off. 6months ago spend a heap on the latest hardware and vista locks BSOD's with it.

got enterprise edition with ultimate installed.

runs nice on comp at home. wouldnt touch it if ur comp cost less than 2.5g retail and is relatively new.

good feature is its practically hacker proof. instead of keepping important windows system cache in predicatable parts in memory, its randomly places it all over ur ram without losing speed and making it heaps hard to get to and currupt, etc.

got enterprise edition with ultimate installed.

wouldnt touch it if ur comp cost less than 2.5g retail and is relatively new.

good feature is its practically hacker proof.

would call both of those statements ignorant to say the least.

As cubes said hes had it running on his setup fine, and my system, only new within the last 5 months wont finalize the installation.

Hacker proof...dont make me laugh...

They say these things as a marketing ploy like they do with all other ones before it. Xp was supposed to be more secure than previous version, but theres always someone out there with a death wish against bill/M$ that wants to show how ignorant people are...

Its the newer systems that are seeming to have more trouble than others atm, but give it time im sure they will sort out issues. By that time im sure that Vienna will be out and running...

I have had RC2 running dual boot on my home PC and it works perfectly.

Have just installed Home Premium on a new clients machine (X2 3800) and it runs a dream - only took around 20 minutes to install too!

I would do scans on your ram to see if that is the cause. Quite often is with MS installs.

2.5g is a touch excessive. Is that with software?.

Retail for just under 2k u can get a decent amd x2 or intel core 2duo, 2gb ram, 320gb sata II, nvidia 7900gs, 19" lcd, dvdburner, case/psu, keyboard, mouse, altec 3 piece speakers. But without software.

To reduce the price..

$160 odd less for 1gb instead of 2,

$100 less for a slower vid card

$30 less for a 250gb sataII

$50 less for a slightly slower cpu

-----

$340 so totalling a system worth ~$1600 you could get something that will easily run vista and the odd game without any issues. + software.

Its minimum requirement of 512mb is quite silly, I've tried for my own curiosity.

768mb I feel is the absolute bare minimum if you want reasonable performance/prettyness.

--

Bl4ck32... Give memtest another hit overnight (loop test 5 & 8). Just in case. :banana:

--

I'll be throwing it on my oldies system in the next few days to see how they like it.

(Core 2 Duo E6400, 1gb Kingston 667, Intel m/board, 7300GT) That system cost next to nothing to build. :laugh:

--

Andrew, on the note of vista have you see the nephew widget thats an Internode costomer has slapped together?

nephew.jpg

http://www.madfellas.com/internode/nephew.gadget

why is every1 quick to critisize me. if u want the mininum bare basics to run ultimate fine. if u want to have a good experience with it then as i said 2.5gs. also ultimate does have a LARGE improvement of security and at the moment is pretty much hacker proof, not from ur stupid nerd geek making a virus with 15 lines of code to make ur AV software popup, but from someone actually accessing your personal files thru tampering with windows and finding values in RAM. black ignorance isnt bliss.

"The UK Green Party says that Vista's DRM requirements will force many unnecessary hardware upgrades. Quoting: 'There will be thousands of tonnes of dumped monitors, video cards, and whole computers that are perfectly capable of running Vista — except for the fact they lack the paranoid lock down mechanisms Vista forces you to use.

That's an offensive cost to the environment. Future archaeologists will be able to identify a "Vista Upgrade Layer" when they go through our landfill sites.'"

read this.

why is every1 quick to critisize me. if u want the mininum bare basics to run ultimate fine. if u want to have a good experience with it then as i said 2.5gs. also ultimate does have a LARGE improvement of security and at the moment is pretty much hacker proof, not from ur stupid nerd geek making a virus with 15 lines of code to make ur AV software popup, but from someone actually accessing your personal files thru tampering with windows and finding values in RAM. black ignorance isnt bliss.

Well 2g is pretty close to 2.5g. But you could scrape through and save a few hundred and still experience vista in all its glory if your not so much in to games, not every one is. :laugh:

If your 2.5g system is with software then yes its on the mark, if not then it is a touch expensive. BUT retail vary's so damn much.

~8-9years ago when I was a partner in a computer business it was often the case we had to buy from interstate in bulk as it was a hell of a lot cheaper than buying here in Adelaide. Adelaide prices even without markup you'd be paying very close to what competitors were selling 'retail'. Unsure if things have changed since then.

why is every1 quick to critisize me. if u want the mininum bare basics to run ultimate fine. if u want to have a good experience with it then as i said 2.5gs. also ultimate does have a LARGE improvement of security and at the moment is pretty much hacker proof, not from ur stupid nerd geek making a virus with 15 lines of code to make ur AV software popup, but from someone actually accessing your personal files thru tampering with windows and finding values in RAM. black ignorance isnt bliss.

A 'Vista Capable' PC will require at least an 800MHz processor, 512MB of system memory, a DirectX 9 capable graphics card, a 40GB hard drive with at least 15GB of free space, a DVD drive, and audio and internet capabilities.

The only extra requirements for a 'Vista Premium Ready' PC are a 1GHz 32-bit (x86) or 64-bit (x64) processor, 1GB of Ram and a graphics card with 128MB of onboard memory capable of supporting Windows Aero2.

An Aero2 compatible card is a DirectX 9-class graphics processor that supports WDDM, Pixel Shader 2.0 in hardware, 32 bits per pixel, and 64MB of graphics memory to support a single monitor less than 1,310,720 pixels.

128MB of graphics memory will be required to support a single monitor at resolutions from 1,310,720 to 2,304,000 pixels, or 256MB of graphics memory to support a single monitor at resolutions higher than 2,304,000 pixels.

At most, the typical consumer with a PC even a few years old is only looking at buying a new graphics card and some extra memory.

90% of people who "upgrade" to vista arnt going to run out and dump the 2.5g they spent 6 months ago to just use vista.

Virii and or hacks are out and will be well spread within 6 months anyway, and by that time the 2.5k system u refer to will be out of date.

Its not going to make the internet faster, or 90% of programs people are using now. In fact most gamers are the ones suffering atm, due to lack of driver support from Nivida.

********

Ive had Vista installed and working fine via Vmware?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...