Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

plus 40mins only of Counter Strike: Source (hate it, what a terrible game full of free hacks),

lol i bet most of them wernt hacking if you played me and pauly you would call me a hack within 5 mins some nights

so no more CSS pauly or you will just play a bit of both

Well i have

STALKER it came into work on monday, and like i said it will be average and thats what i think of it. Like i said it suffers from being in development for too long.

Sure it is fun and know doubt i'll complete it, it just isn't what it could or was going to be if it was released on time.

It is out today retail so pick it up if you've been hanging for it cos you will certainly enjoy it. And there is a CE and standard edition so remember that if you want the fancy one.

My old 80gig hdd just gave up the ghost a few weeks ago so i purchased a 73 gig 10,000 rpm sata drive. nice and fast and future proof. I'll just use my new 250 gig drive for movies, torrents, mp3's etc.

yer i dont think that much of it. To some it might be just another FPS. My pc runs it sweet, UNDER XP ONLY. Good thing ive kept xp and vista dual boot still. Dont get me wrong it works and installs in vista, but theres heaps of vid problems ive had in game.

My pc specs- x2 3800+((2.4ghz), 2gigram, 7900gt, a8n32, 74g raptor etc etc...this runs it up all max settings fine with no lag. But i have heard others with 8800's have to turn down some lighting effects, so who knows...

If your not a hard core FPS player, id say dont bother.

Personally I like the idea however the combat sucks balls, the weapons are inaccurate unless up close and don't pack much punch. It generally feels very clumsy, I shot a guy in the head with a shotgun and he didn't die.

Wtf? just seems very sloppy, Id like to be able to go prone and get a headshot with the ak from 50m however you can barely do that from 10m away.

how comfortably can I run stalker kralster, I have Core 2 Duo E6600, 750gb in 3 sata2 250gb hdds (no raid, f**k raid lol), 2 gigs of Kingston DDR2 800, nVidia 7950GX2 1gb DDR3 (512x2 shared). is this a stupid question, In stalker videos they talk of how the game will be independant of hardware spec and will only be limited to whatever the hardware can max out on?

Pauly your pc should run it very sweetly, in fact i'd love to see it run on your pc.

I'm running it on a athlon 64 3200+, 1 gig or ram, geforce6600GT, and i'm running it at 1377x768, on medium setttings quite nicely.

So you should have no problem.

Would love to see some screenies too!

Im currently running Stalker on a AMD 4000+, 2GB RAM, 512mb 7900GT @ 1680x1050 with max everything and i can really see that if i had a higher spec PC then it would look so much more crispy.

It doesn't jerk or lag but it could run alot smoother thats for sure!

EDIT: He was hacking, he openly admitted too it, from what i could tell he was coding, walling and aim bot

Edited by MADGT4
  • 4 weeks later...

ok, this has been really pissing me off, i have had to reformat (4th time in 3 weeks) :D :D :angry::rant:

i have been trying to run a few videos and my media player won't locate the codec needed to run .WMV files:( it locates it and will only play the audio off of it. Is there anyway to install codecs manually and where can i find them? i have googled it and haven't come up with much.

lol sorry for the nooby question, but this is pissing me off and i can't figure it out :thumbsup:

PS I F*&^ING HATE WINDOWS

http://www.champcar.nl/pages/news.php?id=2851&lg=us

got our first review over the sim we are making :P at the moment it still uses rfactor (for file set up while we are building our full commercial product)

looks like people pver in th eUS have really taken to our game, which is good for us :bunny:

ok, this has been really pissing me off, i have had to reformat (4th time in 3 weeks) :P:D:rant: :rant:

i have been trying to run a few videos and my media player won't locate the codec needed to run .WMV files:( it locates it and will only play the audio off of it. Is there anyway to install codecs manually and where can i find them? i have googled it and haven't come up with much.

lol sorry for the nooby question, but this is pissing me off and i can't figure it out :bunny:

PS I F*&^ING HATE WINDOWS

Run Windows Update...

and....

Do you install codec packs? I've found they can be a real pain in the arse; some completely screw the video playback and even after uninstalling they still leave it stuffed.

3rd Party... I find I only ever need/use Xvid and Divx.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • And if you want more power, more reliably, and cheaper, go get the Aussie RB... The 4L Barra and put that in instead.
    • No cats will keep discolouring the rear bar. Sends white paint a weird yellow stain. Cut and polish normally gets it out, but you'll be doing that every fortnight I found.
    • Both heads will be equally reliable or unreliable depending on what you do to them.  Stock the RB26 head will flow more. You have access to the stock intake ITB manifold on the RB26 cheaply which flows really well(1000hp+).   Arguably more aftermarket support for RB26, though in Aus we love our RB30 SOHC heads too.    The only downsides to the RB26 head is if you have a VL commodore and want to keep the SOHC look.  Where you may have an issue is drilling out the rb30 block for the bigger head studs but if you are building a big power motor you'd probably put bigger studs on the SOHC head too.  This is just about finding a good machine shop, sometimes easier said than done.  RB30 head worked can make big power just like a Rb26 head, so really it actually more comes down to what your preference is for your car.  People now even making billet versions of both.
    • 2630s work perfectly well. There is something to be said for just using the 30 head, as it saves all the pain of the conversion, still makes tons of power, still sounds cool, etc etc. 2630 will obviously make more power again, but the differences are not stupidly big. It really depends on whether you're racing for sheep stations or not. If it's dead serious, then it's a 26 head. If it's just for fun, it could go either way. But the 26 head and the effort to get it set up, etc etc, is part of the fun.
    • I've been building a 26/30 for a few years now. I've had the head built with all the good stuff. I had a 32 gtr but blew it up and yes its all going into a vl but im looking for some advice from some RB nuts on pros and cons on putting a 26 head on a 30 bottom end is it worth it Works are as follows Head -Extensive porting 1mm oversized supertech valves Supertech double springs Supertech valve guides Supertech titanium retainers Tomei solid lifters Tomei 270 x 10.25 cams Head drain Bottom end series 2 rb30 block Cp ceramic coated pistons Eagle rods Romac balancer Oil restrictions  O ringed blah blah spent a fortune And will get a girdle because the 30s arent used to handling that much rpm Nitto billet oil pump Hypertune plenum 6boost mani Refurbed astra pump thats the cover for it in the boot I did have a precision 6262 but sold it because drag car life. Currently building the ass end full 4 link floater rear end with a 2 speed  But the dilemma i have is my mate rekens I should just stick with the 30 head for reliability. Has any one had any issues with mounting the 26 head ie compression blowing gaskets etc. Just looking for some advice from people who have gone down this route. Here's some photos. Blew the oil pump in the gtr and decided to rip the motor out at the time and do a full build only to find it had been a repairable write off so went down this path.     
×
×
  • Create New...