Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I am in the process of putting in a Series 2 engine in a series 1 R33 Skyline. I found the wiring harness is different for the two (including the ECU). How do i install the engine and wire it up properly if the harness is different? :P I know i have to use the series 2 ECU and i have change over the air-flow meter(i have both these parts).

Do i put the series 2 ECU on the Series 1 harness and wire up the engine and engine bay plugs. This seems easier. :)

OR

Do i pull out the series 1 harness, put in the Series 2 harness with ECU and wire up the engine plugs and engine bay plugs. If so what are the modifications required. Some of the S2 plugs wont fit on the engine bay! :laugh:

Your input would be much helpful. Kinda stuck at the moment on what to do.

Cheers

Jerry

Jerry,

I would suggest the easiest option would be to use the Series 1 harness together with relevant series 1 sensors (eg AFM, CAS, TPS etc) otherwise you will have to rewire part of the series 2 loom to ensure power feeds etc are correct. As an example, the power feed for the injectors is sourced from different locations and this would need to be considered.

Incidentally the series 2 R33 ECU will run a series 1 R33 motor via a series 1 loom.

Hope this helps.

Cheers,

So there are no worries in connecting a series 2 ECU to the Series 1 harness? I will thus use the series 1 wiring loom to drive the series 2 engine. Is that how you see it (apart from modifying the various sensors)?

So there are no worries in connecting a series 2 ECU to the Series 1 harness? I will thus use the series 1 wiring loom to drive the series 2 engine. Is that how you see it (apart from modifying the various sensors)?

The only difference I am aware of between the pinouts of the series 1 and 2 ECUs is apparently the series 1 ECU earths the Fast Idle Compensation Device (FICD) whereas the series 2 don't. Having said this I recently modified a series 1 loom for a member to suit his cefiro and I discovered that although his loom was a series 1 it did not earth the FICD through the ECU (pin 36). Incidentally he used my series 2 ECU briefly without any problems.

For your info I modified a series 2 loom to suit the Rb25 conversion into my R32 so have had the opportunity to work on both series 1 and series 2 looms.

The series 2 ECU will work with a series 1 loom you should just check if the series 1 loom has a wire at pin 36. If it does you simply need to cut this wire and earth it if you are going to use the series 2 ECU and thereby retain the use of the FICD.

Is there any reason for wanting to use the series 2 ECU over the series 1 given you are thinking of using the series 1 loom?

Hope this helps.

Cheers

I have been told that i have to use the Series 2 ECU for my Series 2 engine. The coil packs are driven differently and there are few other differences.

From what you have explanied.....

1) i shall retain my series 1 harness so all the power leads fit and i don't have to rewire;

2) i shall put in the series 2 engine and wire it up (chaning various sensors);

3) i shall plug the series 2 ECU into the series 1 harness

Is this how you see it.

I hope there are no problems with this.

Thanks in advance for your response.

Jerry,

You will need to use the series 1 coilpacks and power transistor. The series 2 coilpacks have the transistors built into the coilpacks. You simply need to install these with the associated harness that lies underneath the central coil cover.

As mentioned previously, retaining the series 1 harness will require use of most of the series 1 sensors thanks to the different plugs used between the different series eg Crank angle sensor, TPS (?), airflow meter.

In summary, the series 2 ECU will operate a series 1 motor so if you are unsure about a sensor I would suggest you use the series 1. As a little comfort the Apexi PFC for the series 1 and 2 R33 RB25s are the same. Don't forget you can use the series 1 ECU if so desired.

Refer also my previous post re FICD control.

Hope this helps.

Cheers

Edited by BH_SLO32

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I have been being VERY quiet about what you're alluding to, as it is something that ticks me off... The number of cars from factory that run coil overs is HUGE! Most of them these days do... The other part that annoys me, is people saying "Well all the incabin adjustable suspension is illegal by blah blah blah"... If that's the case, then why can I buy a car brand new that can do it if, FULL STOP in cabin adjustable suspension is illegal...   Also, I could just chuck some aftermarket shocks in my car, throw the stock springs on, after my blue slip, dump my super low springs back in. Same shock and spring style setup... Hell, they could also be the same colour springs etc.     I'm voting, BlueSlipper didn't want to touch the above car for some reason. Whether it be some sort of bias against the car, the owner, them maybe having previously done dodgy shit and now they're being super careful in case they get slapped in the face by the Gumbyment again... Find a new blueslip place.   And can confirm as you had said, yes there are holy bibles of vehicle heights, and all sorts of other suspension stuff. Heck your run of the mill mechanic, and tyre shop has access to all of that stuff. It's how they do wheel alignments...
    • Funny story Heading to Sydney this morning on the HWY there was some slow traffic, so I gave it the beans and midway through my overtaking "power run" I lost all power It seems that I missed a hose clamp,  and the MAF and filter went WiFi To make this more problematic, the little tool kit that lives in the boot, is sitting in the sun room at Goulburn......LOL Luckily for me I found a bit of steel on the side of the road that could be used like a rusty and bent flat head screw driver to tighten it up enough that it got me into Sydney, it is now all tight like a tiger with the aid of a 8mm socket Note to self: Use my brain and double check stuff, and always keep that little tool kit in the car for when I have a brain fart
    • Oh, and as for everyone with their fuel economy changes, I switch between E10 and 98 in the company car. Even do when I had personal cars that could run on E10. You know what changed my fuel economy in any noticeable way? How I drove, and where I drove. Otherwise, say on full tanks of just back and forth from work only (So same trips, same sort of traffic), couldn't notice a difference that I can correlate to the type of fuel in use. In the current vehicle, that's over 42L of USABLE fuel. While 98 is all "more energy dense", it also has higher knock resistance as it takes more energy to get it to ignite too. The longer hydrocarbons, typically more tightly bound. So running the same ignition map, can also produce less power, if there isn't enough time to get it all burnt through properly, as yep, the flame propagation speed is different from lower octane fuel to higher (Higher has a lower flame propagation, due to the more tightly bound and harder to self ignite funs. This is also typically where, a vehicle that is designed purely to run on 91 (Whether it be E10 or normal 91) usually sees absolutely no real world difference in fuel economy for the normal man, woman, or dog.
    • We've got some servos around me that have 91 with E10, 91 (no E10), 95, and 98. At those stations the change from 91 E10 to 91, is typically around 8c/L.   But lets not get started on the price of fuel in Oz. It's ridiculous. All the service stations around me, bar one, the price of fuel has been over the $2 mark per litre for the cheapest, 98 being around $2.45. That one service station is a CostCo, fuel from it comes from the same refineries, and makes no pitstops, it runs great, including the 98. In fact, I've had no issues on CostCo fuel, but plenty of issues at other stations!. The CostCo fuel, was $1.65 roughly this week for 94 with E10. $1.88 for 98. Servos directly across from it, $2.10 for 91 E10, and $2.48 for 98. The part I had to laugh at? If I drive multiple HOURS away from Brisbane, say out near Nanango, or Kingaroy, or even out to Goondiwindi, the price of their fuel, is the same as what it is at the CostCo... Oh, and that BP servo at Goondiwindi is HUGE and goes through epic turnover of fuel, so it's not sitting there for weeks going to shit. And what blows me away, my mate is one of the people who drives the Fuel Tanker all around QLD, delivering to all those places. At the same company his previous role was doing the "local haul" deliveries... Same truck, same driver, same pickup point it all comes from. So you tell me, how the hell it is 60c/L CHEAPER for fuel, when nearly all else is equal, except they require a B-Double to drive half a day out of Brisbane, and half a day back, every second day, compared to the delivery that can be under 30 minutes drive from the fuel pickup point... Not to mention, go five blocks down the road, and Ampol to Ampol will vary 30c/L... And I've had this conversation with my mate... The way it's priced, is just typical, pure and utter rubbish... He also does runs from Brisbane, to all over QLD, down to Newcastle, Sydney, Nowra, Melbourne, Geelong, and even out to parts of the NT depending on the companies needs. His main stuff is all the longer distance away from home for a few days at a time, then when he's back, he loves to just pickup extra shifts wherever he can in whichever truck, hence all the weird different places.   Oh, as for getting E10 into all the fuels in Australia... It was very quickly highlighted, that we don't have enough biomass available to use to make E10 sustainably like they require, and it would dramatically cut into our, and the worlds food chain supply...   I vote we all just start running on liquid methane gas... Plenty of that just getting tapped off at tips from underground decay... (Note, this is pure just stupid commenting. I could very easily highlight the reasons its not a good idea especially on scale...)
    • Am I correct in assuming that the R35's are getting the classic skyline haircut off the odometer?  Quick search on carsales, there are 33 08 and 09 GTR's for sale, only 2 of them have more then 100,000km's on them (116,075 and 110,000 respectively).  And somehow there are about 25 for sale with around 60,000kms? Looks like the classic skyline haircut to me =/
×
×
  • Create New...