Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I spent about 6-7 hours last night reading up on turbochargers, and other technologies, trying to make the right choice on the next car.

Having experienced the garrett gt2860R turbochargers, I can happily say that doing some proper research is a valuable thing. I thought I might like to share/ask for your opinions on what ive learnt to maybe shed some of the myth behind turbochargers. Theres a lot of stuff I didnt know, that I now know :(

First of all, the reason for me spending the entire night :happy: reading up on this stuff, is that I wanted to find a turbine which had fast spool and decent output. My current setup is (was) a garrett gt2860R-5 bolt on turbine. Funnily enough, garrett has uprated these turbos to 360hp (which is probably the reason why they were a bit laggy and power hungry).

http://www.turbobygarrett.com/turbobygarre...0R_707160_5.htm

I have compared many dyno sheets to my own particularly in terms of spoolup time and can happily say that there is negligible difference between these and the HKS branded 2530s. Full boost hits at around the 4800 rpm mark, which is precisely on target with the hks units (based on my mods :P )

For after market turbine statistics (the other than genuine) this chart is excellent in comparing turbine stats

http://www.geocities.jp/bnr32labo/sub10.htm

The second thing I tried to find, is another turbine set with very similar specifications. And i found this:

http://image.www.rakuten.co.jp/wildhippo/img10301215989.jpeg

Now the hks ARMS 7660 has a slightly smaller compressor wheel, and has a smaller A/R on the compressor. Its spoolup is very similar to mine (I had 0.5 bar at 3300rpm just like in the pic). Full boost hits at about 4800rpm. Note - these are all on a stock bottom ended rb26. If anything, these should spool up quicker than a 2530 due to the smaller compressor housing.

Based on all these facts (or whatever you want to call them) I started comparing turbine technologies for my next possible turbo setup. I was quite keen on the gt-ss turbines, but i seriously doubt they can make the power that I would like them to (500-550 REAL ps). Now all the turbos here are made by garrett, and I dont believe there is any whoop-dee-doo in the hks compressor covers of all the hks gt series turbos (could be wrong) that actually make a difference.

A quick comparison between the hks gt-ss and the tomei arms 7655 which are a very similarly sized turbo and are rated at very different power outputs. For example, as a twin setup, the tomei 7655 are rated at 500ps, and the gt-ss are rated at 320hp each. Now, noting that more flow through a turbine can only be achieved by having a larger trim on the compressor OR exhaust wheels - trim is the squared ratio of inducer/exducer in the compressor/exhaust wheels. Now noting this, the 7655 turbine wheel exit diameter is an extra 5mm in size. This clearly suggests that the turbine will not run out of puff in the top end side of things (am i right or wrong?) and the tomei should flow more, albeit with a slightly slower spoolup?

I've been wondering about this all night, as to why the power differences are so significant. Im tempted to fork out the extra 100,000 yen for the tomei turbos, but nobody has used them, and nobody either here the uk or nz has an opinion on them. Google searching japan reveals nothing. So im not sure what to do?

P127_01_arms.gif

This graph shows the relative spoolup of the tomei range of turbos - its interesting to note, that there is a significant difference in output between the 7660 and the 7655 turbos even though there is only a few mm difference in comp wheels.

Suggestions & opinions? Im probably going to get blasted for the anti-hks stuff ive said :( But are they really as good as they say they are, or are they just fairly well matched turbine units to the rb26

Another thing I've been wondering, what would it be like to runu a slightly larger turbo but change the headgasket to something a bit thinner. Eg, there are 0.9mm metal headgaskets out there that raise comp to 8.7:1 . Would this be a safe manner of reducing spoolup times, while running no more than 1.3 bar, or is this unsafe ?

Cheers

Tommy

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/110503-turbo-technology/
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Here is the mess that I made. That filler there was successful in filling dents in that area. But in the middle area. I can feel dents. And I've gone ocer it multiple times with filler. And the filler is no longer there because i accidently sanded it away. I've chased my tail on this job but this is something else lol. So I'm gonna attempt filler one more time and if it doesn't work I'll just high fill primer the door and see where the issues are because guidecoat is of no use atm.
    • Ok, so I think I sort of figured out where I went wrong. So I definitely overthinked it, and I over sanded, which is probably a large part of the problem. to fix it, I ended up tapping some spots that were likely to be high, made them low, filled them in, and I tackled small sections at a time, and it feels a lot better.    I think what confused me as well is you have the bare metal, and some spots darker and some are lighter, and when I run my finger across it, it' would feel like it's a low spot, but I think it's just a transition in different texture from metal to body filler.    When your finger's sliding on the body filler, and crosses over to the bare metal, going back and forth, it feels like it's a low spot. So I kept putting filler there and sanding, but I think it was just a transition in texture, nothing to do with the low or high spot. But the panel's feels a lot better, and I'm just going to end up priming it, and then I'll block it after with guide coat.   Ended up wasting just about all of my filler on this damn door lol  
    • -10 is plenty for running to an oil cooler. When you look at oil feeds, like power steering feeds, they're much smaller, and then just a larger hose size to move volume in less pressure. No need for -12. Even on the race cars, like Duncans, and endurance cars, most of them are all running -10 and everything works perfectly fine, temps are under control, and there's no restrictions.
    • Update: O2 sensor in my downpipe turned out to be faulty when I plugged in to the Haltech software. Was getting a "open circuit" warning. Tons of carbon buildup on it, probably from when I was running rich for a while before getting it corrected. Replaced with new unit and test drove again. The shuffle still happens, albeit far less now. I am not able to replicate it as reliably and it no longer happens at the same RPM levels as before. The only time I was able to hear it was in 5th going uphill and another time in 5th where there was no noticeable incline but applying more throttle first sped it up and then cleared it. Then once in 4th when I slightly lifted the throttle going over a bump but cleared right after. My understanding is that with the O2 sensor out, the ECU relies entirely on the MAP tune and isn't able to make its small adjustments based on the sensors reading. All in all, a big improvement, though not the silver bullet. Will try validating the actuators are set up correctly, and potentially setting up shop time to tune the boost controller on closed loop rather than the open loop it is set to now. Think if it's set up on closed loop to take the O2 reading, that should deal with these last bits. Will try to update again as I go. 
    • More so GReddy oil relocation kits, sandwich plates, etc. all use 10AN fittings. And same, I've only used 10AN and my car sees track work (circuit, doing laps, not 10 sec squirt business).
×
×
  • Create New...