Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 48
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Airflow is all 100%.

With the R33 Airflow correction table it wouldn't idle, unsure why as its running everything R33, being the airflow curve, maps, etc..

With regards to afm voltage, it peaks at 4330mv, being 4.33v. ;)

Running the std afm that would be around 5 to 5.1v.

I've attached a tuned vs untuned compare map.

The red indicates leaned off.

For example if the initial value is 1.000 the modified value is 0.996 the compare map will indicate a red value of 4. Derived from 1.000 - 0.996 = 0.004.

unsure what the +19 value is at load point 9 rpm N06. Possibly a tuning slip up. :D

An hour was only spent working on light load so it isn't a perect tune, the other hour was trouble shooting. :P

The tunes rough enough for now. No point spending big $$ (500-600) on a nice tune when there's bigger turbo's to come and will most likely require a map resolution (map reference) change. :D

post-382-1144475190.gif

Well I went for a long drive today. Did 230km's and used 1/2 a tank of fuel. Now I was driving normally for about 80% of the drive, I did some overtaking and saw 160-170k a few times... and the first 1/6 of the drive was actually a hill climb up a local range where I just couldn't help myself playing chase with someone in an evo 4 and occasionally hit around 5500 rpm at 16lb. Incidently this is about 10-11ms pulse width on the injectors. I also sat on about 120k's for 3/4 of the trip home.

Relivent details for the engine are.... RB20DET 100% internall stock, GT25 BB 400, 0.64 compressor, 0.7 turbine, Wolf ecu, front mount IC. My GTS4 has a manual gtr gearbox too, not the auto.

Here's my current map settings approx...As a lot of you use MAF instead if MAP sensors i'll translate to PSI and you can all work it out from that...

Below 2000 RPM...

0 PSI - 14.2

-5 in-hg - 14.0

-10in-gh - 13.8:1 (going slightly rich here really helped make the throttle response snappy.

-18in-hg 14.2 to 13.8 depending if aircon is on at idle, and about 14.0 when cruising.

Above 2000 RPM

2psi - 14.2:1

0psi - 14.7:1

-5in-hg - 15:1

-10in-gh - 15.5:1

-15in-hg - 16:1

-20in-hg - 0:1 (0ms fuel value)

Ignition advance was at 36 degrees. at 0 psi and increases to a max of 38 or 42 under vacuum. I can't remember exactly how far it advances.

I am also using decceleration En-leanment. The reverse of a throttle pump setting to lean things during negative throttle movements, which is one of the advances settings for economy tuning the wolf.

Closed loop operation was disabled for the whole drive.

The resutls... All in 5th gear.

Peak cruise power was found to be at about -5hg on the boost gauge at 100-105k's in 5th gear on level ground. The injector pulse width maxed out at about 2.40ms to 2.45ms. This was while at a 15.5:1 AFR.

Increasing speed to 110k's increased the fuel requirement to about 2.6ms and the resulting change to 14.7:1 AFR at 0 PSI.

Finally at 120k's the fuel requirement increased further to 2.8ms and again maintained around 14.7:1 AFR at 0 PSI.

So, I think with this tune if I were able to keep my right foot under control (or install a throttle stop) I could possibly see 500k's with this tune.

I'll post the actual map up tomorrow.

I'll have to also see how things go this next week with driving around town economy. Results will be posted.

Cheers,

Ian

Well the wolf uses a setting called Transient Delcel Enleanment. It does the reverse of a throttle pump and reduces fuel delivered to the engine during deceleration.

Eg... SUppose you are cruising at 100k's and start to go down a slight incline, you remove your foot slightly from the accelerator to maintain the same road speed. The wolf will reduce fuel delivery a pre-set amount for a preset limit, exactly the same as a carburators throttle pump would add fuel during acceleration, but reverse. This keeps reduces un-necessary overfueling while the ecu settles on a new RPM/MAP sensor position on the fuel map.

Remember the reason for transient enrichment in a carburator is to deliver extra fuel to stop hesitation during sudden throttle position changes, while map or maf sensors settle on a new load setting. Transient ENLEANMENT does the opposite to concerve fuel.

I also use Over run fuel cut, which is meant for when your rolling down a hill and take your foot off the accelerator. Above 1600 RPM and at 0 throttle the ecu stops all fuel delivery and lets the engine naturally reduce engine speed. Its also used between gear shifts.

You turn both these off if you want to maintain boost better between gear shifts and are racing or something.

Hope that helps...

Cheers,

Ian.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I seem to the be only person that is using a Haltech 2500 on an NA motor, I've installed a Bosch DBW throttle body to the OEM intake manifold and am having problems maintaining AFR even with the wideband o2.  It will run extremely rich at idle and up to redline, but under load it will go extremely lean in the 20s and i'm essentially having to rev it over 4k and feather the clutch to get it up to speed.  I've read a few other threads of about the butterfly, it seems removing the vacuum to it is supposed to have it remain open, i've noticed no difference under 4k with the vacuum line to it plugged.  I'm hoping someone here has had luck using the NA manifold with Haltech, and if they happen to have a tune for it.  
    • I don't know any details, but I really wouldn't be surprised if they do it as a LHD only version, at least initially.
    • Thanks for the replies everyone. Definitely a coolant push. Oil catch can is empty and always has been. As the engine is out now I'll be having a good look over things. I do have some detonation on the piston tops from a trigger issue back about 5 years ago. I felt it and shut off then bought a new ecu and changed the trigger. Never been an issue since. It never hurt the power, its made almost 80hp more since that incident but I will pull the bearing caps to take a look. If the bearings are damaged I will do a bottom end refresh. Head is being re conditioned at the moment and the block will be cleaned and checked to ensure it's flat. I'll go with a kameari gasket and see how it ends up. The other thing I'm not super keen on is the cylinder colours. I suspect this is from the inlet manifold. The plan will be to put it back together, retune and then stick a plazmaman billet inlet on it and retune. I'm happy with the power, if it makes a little more, then great, but I would rather just make everything more efficient at this stage.
    • Maybe they'll look to do a bunch of presales to help inject some cash fast for their financial issues...
    • Does it also misfire equally when revving?   Josh is very correct in what you should do. The coilpack harness wiring loom itself is a known problem due to its age and the number of heat cycles it has gone through. Throwing parts at a vehicle to diagnose the issue isn't a smart or good way to do it. Secondly, you may have a bad coil pack, you pop replacements in, they fix that issue, but messing with the harness breaks it, so the issue persists. So now you think "well it wasn't the coil packs" and have to continue chasing your tail, potentially swapping back in your shit coil packs and returning the good ones (yes, I've seen people do this because 'it wasn't the problem' and they want to save money). And suddenly, you've got two issues with the same symptoms...   Diagnose, don't use the spare parts shotgun.
×
×
  • Create New...