Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 43
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest FlyGuy

If you have already lost your lisence recently just assume you'll get busted for it. The cops don't need any evidence, they can estimate. The more experienced a traffic police officer is, the better there assumption will stand up in court.

The police officer doesn't need to be at court, if you've been handed a ticket the judge does the rest.

There is no way out :bahaha:

I've been through this so many times I just say now oh well I don't care. I've lost my lisence twice and currently have one point left :bahaha:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/11511-cops/page/2/#findComment-198389
Share on other sites

ALWAYSSSS get out of your car and insist on seeing the speed reading (its on an electronic gadget on their dashboard).

If they say now just piss on either of their legs, if they yeah sure then u know your up sh1t creak without a paddle.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/11511-cops/page/2/#findComment-198401
Share on other sites

Have to agree with Benm... honestly John... were you speeding? if you were then you have to accept this. like many have said before... there are places to speed and they are not on a public road. If you really think that you were not speeding then take it to court.

It is bad news to here however and I hope everything turns out ok for you.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/11511-cops/page/2/#findComment-198688
Share on other sites

correct me if i'm wrong anyone...if an officer incorrectly fills out a speeding ticket which in this case he did because he didnt state the speed u were doing, it deems it invalid ???, and also the cops cant do u with out a radar unless u admit u were speeding...i got done overtaking an unmarked cop 4wd on my cbr250rr 1 week before i got my r33...it was a 40 zone and he reckoned i was doin about 140 .... hehehe took them bout 10 kays to catch me with backup, i didnt even know he was after me till a paddy wagon nearly ran me over when i was stopped at the lights minding my own business, anyway 3 cops in the 4wd all givin me shit tryin to get me to admit it...nah mate..i was doin 40, anyway they gave me a warning and if it wasnt for that i wouldnt have my skyline woke me up a lot !!, but sometimes not enough...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/11511-cops/page/2/#findComment-198899
Share on other sites

John, here's the deal. When a cop pulls you over for speeding, he has to have proof of your speed. The first thing you should have asked is, "Can I please see the radar reading". If he produces the radar reading, then you are creamed. If they refuse, then that means they have no proof.

Not many people win in court but if you decide to go to court, here is my advice.

1. Firstly do you have a perfect driving record and is this your first offense. If the answer is "NO" then you might have to do a few extra hours down at Webstation to save up for the fine.

2. If you do have a clean record, then what you should do is pay the fine first, then disputed with a letter or go to court, emphasising your perfect driving record and you strongly belief that you were not speeding. Tell them it was the GTR that was 200m in front of you that was speeding but you got cought in the radar range. Otherwise you are just delaying the invevitable.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/11511-cops/page/2/#findComment-201393
Share on other sites

Bad advice there, sorry Swoop.

It CLEARLY says NOT to pay the fine if you intend on contesting it. Paying the fine is an admission of guilt, and they won't give you the time of day after you have already given them your money.

DO NOT PAY THE FINE IF YOU INTEND TO CONTEST THE TICKET.

From what I've read, you *were* speeding, and you got caught.. I think you should suck it up and take it like a man........ but then again, 6 months is a loooooooong time to be banned from driving, so perhaps it's worth contesting the ticket.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/11511-cops/page/2/#findComment-201403
Share on other sites

Originally posted by swoop

John, here's the deal. When a cop pulls you over for speeding, he has to have proof of your speed. The first thing you should have asked is, "Can I please see the radar reading". If he produces the radar reading, then you are creamed. If they refuse, then that means they have no proof.

Not many people win in court but if you decide to go to court, here is my advice.

Exactly, if you ask to see the speed they have to show you, if not then it will come down to the adversary system.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/11511-cops/page/2/#findComment-201408
Share on other sites

i found out that if i am convicted by a court, my fine will be incresed to $2200 (my friend went to rta and found a brocher stating this...) prolli not worth the time and money with my not-perfectly-clean record....

but still, do you know any lawyers specializing in these matters?

thank you for ur inputs guys... ;)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/11511-cops/page/2/#findComment-201651
Share on other sites

Just to clarify things:

If you choose to have the matter heard in court, there are several possible outcomes.

1. The judge finds you guilty. You pay your fine, to the value originally stated, plus $55 (or thereabouts) court fees.

2. The judge finds you innocent. You don't pay a cent, and the incident gets struck from your driving record completely.

3. The judge gives you a "Section 10", which is basically you will pay the fine to the value originally stated, plus court fees, but no points will be lost, and the incident will not be recorded on your driving record.

4. You are able to plea the penalty down... In this instance, instead of losing 6 points, and a $1515 fine, you can plead it down to $1000 fine, and 3 points off your licence... (I'm not sure about this one, lawyers say it never happens, I know of people who claim it has happened to them)

5. If you are convicted by a court for speeding, the maximum penalty they can apply is $2200 (regardless of what the original fine was), but this option is rarely taken by a judge... BUT, in this case of speeding 50km/h over the posted limit, I believe there is a good chance of the judge raising the fine if you are found guilty.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/11511-cops/page/2/#findComment-201667
Share on other sites

I am pretty sure they can book you without having to show you the radar reading. Can anyone confirm that? What happens when they have one cop pinging traffic and another 500m down the road pulling people over? Does the cop have to jog it down just because you asked to see a radar reading?

What's to stop a cop pinging someone at 10km/h over and then just say "oh, you were doing 10km/h over, so were you, so were you" by leaving the hold value on.

If you're difficult about it and fire up with the "you can't book me unless you show me the radar reading" then they'll only make your life harder. I believe that's an americanism because americans are so obsessed with their "rights".

If however you genuinely don't believe you were doing that speed, say so politely and see how you go. Worst case the cop's a hard case and you go to court.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/11511-cops/page/2/#findComment-202044
Share on other sites

thanks for the info andrew...

yeah , i am afraid that the result will be number5...

5. If you are convicted by a court for speeding, the maximum penalty they can apply is $2200 (regardless of what the original fine was), but this option is rarely taken by a judge... BUT, in this case of speeding 50km/h over the posted limit, I believe there is a good chance of the judge raising the fine if you are found guilty.

thats why i want to ask a lawyer about possilble outcome b4 i go all the way to court...

so, for the third time, anyone know of a lawyer that treats these matters?? should i contact rta to give me some contacts? ;)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/11511-cops/page/2/#findComment-202227
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Merli

Bad advice there, sorry Swoop.

It CLEARLY says NOT to pay the fine if you intend on contesting it. Paying the fine is an admission of guilt, and they won't give you the time of day after you have already given them your money.

DO NOT PAY THE FINE IF YOU INTEND TO CONTEST THE TICKET.

From what I've read, you *were* speeding, and you got caught.. I think you should suck it up and take it like a man........ but then again, 6 months is a loooooooong time to be banned from driving, so perhaps it's worth contesting the ticket.

Merli, it may be bad advice but it is by the book. If you read at the bottom of any speeding ticket or parking fine, it actually says to pay your fine then dispute. That is the only reason why I said that...I personally wouldn't do it myself but sometimes if you play by the book, they might be a bit more lenient than usual.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/11511-cops/page/2/#findComment-205042
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...