Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

I have done a search and read a bunch of very helpful posts (thanks SK!)

First a bit of background. I have bought and installed a set of HSD HR coilovers for my R33 GTST. The spring rates are roughly 430 pounds in the fronts and 350 in the rears (i do have the actual rates written down somewhere)...so not too hard but a bit harder than the rates SK uses on his R32 race car.

I recently lowered the spring seat and reduced the preloading on the spring to next to nothing....just enough to hold the spring in place. I had an improvement in the ride comfort for small to medium differences in the road surface....however going over deep potholes and speed humps the ride is terrible....i attribute this from what i've read on here to be the car hitting the bump stops.

So I guess from this i have to preload the spring more. I thought about starting with 4mm extra height on the spring seat as a starting point.

Anyway my questions are:

1) Is it normal to set coilovers up with a degree of preload on the springs for an R33 GTST? (I know this is a very loose question)

2) The rebound is adjustable on the top of the struts and indicates an L for adusting the knob left and an H for adjusting the knob to the right....now i didn't receive any documentation on adjusting the coilovers when i received them....so I thought L would make it softer and H would make it harder....have i got this right?

3) do you think the 4mm of extra spring seat height is a good place to start?

Cheers for your advice

Morlock

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/116472-preloading-springs-on-coilovers/
Share on other sites

My 22 cents (that 20 cents plus GST) worth........

1. Preload has zero effect on the spring rate, it doesn't matter how much preload you add the spring rate is still 430 lbs per inch in the front and 350 lbs per inch in the rear.

When you put the weight of the car on the springs, they have preload anyway. So the little bit that you add by adjusting the lower spring seat is irrelevant.

Some simple numbers;

R33GTST weighs say 1400 kgs

65% front = ~900 kgs (1980 lbs)

The front spring rate is 430 lbs per inch

So 1980 / 2 / 430 = 2.3" (58.5 mm) of spring compression to hold up the front

35% rear = ~500 kgs (1100 lbs)

The rear spring rate is 350 lbs per inch

So 1100 / 2 / 350 = 1.6" (40 mm) of spring compression to hold up the rear

2. Clockwise is usually high damping level. Give it try, you should be able to pick the difference beween full soft and full hard pretty easily.

3. Preload affects the ride height, so you set the lower spring seat position to achieve the desired height.

:ban: Cheers :D

Edited by Sydneykid
Thanks SK

Will having more preload on the spring cause the shock to be overworked? I only ask this because i was advised by the vendor that "too much" preload on the spring would make the damper work harder.

Cheers

Rubbish :P

:) cheers :P

Edited by Sydneykid

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, sort of blurring two different things together, aren't we? I just meant O2 feedback closed loop. I used to have a 0-1V LCD meter on my dash, wired directly to the O2 sensor signal. So you could easily see what it was doing. Normal running it would flick back and forth nicely. Slow down to an idle and it would keep flicking, as the ECU tried to servo to maintain stoich, but it would slow down as each swing happened until it would stay at one end of the scale. As I said above, the sensor heater is not enough to keep it hot enough when there is also little heat in the exhaust flow. Give it a blip and it would start swinging again, then peter out again. Meanwhile, idle speed control would run just fine, because unrelated.
    • It's not even O2 feedback, it's just simply when the ECU sees the closed TPS signal for whatever reason the idle will start steadily dropping until the engine dies. With the TPS adjusted to not trigger closed TPS it will idle at some ridiculously high RPM and something like 6 degrees of timing. In the absence of getting eyes on it personally and a lot of quality time doing diagnostics I couldn't tell you what the real problem was but it was interesting nonetheless
    • Oof. One of my mates has an R34 GT-R that he initially was a "I want to go twins for response and convenience" on his stock 2.6 with Kelford 272 cams, but his friends are pests and were always in his ear about their place being in the bin.   Eventually one of the 2860-5s decided to add it's own input and force his hand, so he conceded and went for a Pulsar 6262G ("G35 900") with T4 0.85 hotside.    Here's an overlay of the results, same cams, same stock bottom end, same boost, same fuel, just from a pretty tidy 2860-5 install to a Pulsar turbo on a 6boost maniifold on BP98.   Worth mentioning here, it may seem like a dead horse thing but the dyno plot doesn't tell the story of how much better it is to drive - transient response has completely changed the car, he used to have flat foot shifting to stop it having to wind up again on gear changes even at >7000rpm... now it builds boost faster than that even short shifting.   It's 100% transformed the car before you even consider how much better it holds on: Pulsar and Garrett aren't the same, but from our experience if you're just looking for a better drive and the ability to make the same or more power I think the divided G30 770 would probably be the smallest I'd go to.
    • Great work Duncan, any events local you will give it a test once all done? 
×
×
  • Create New...