Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

when i shake the rear of the car from left to right i get a clunk i got under the bottom of the car and shook the drive shafts from left to right there was a little play is this normal? if not how do i tighten them up?

the noise MAY also be coming from the hicas when i was under the car i got some one to shake it for me while i had my hand on the steering arms is there a way to tighten up the play in the hicas ?? if its not the drive shafts.

any help would be good cheers dave

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/117608-noise-from-the-rear/
Share on other sites

Why don't you get under there and get some one to rock the car! Would be a lot more affective than hoping someone on here has a miricle cure.

If it is an audible knock that you can hear while rocking the car it should be a piece of cake to hear when you're right under there with it!

Ouch, that's a bit nasty! My appologies. I was flicking between threads and e-mail and lost track of what I was doing. No need to go insulting people though, even if i didn't pass year two!

For some decent advice though, your best bet is to get under the car and get a second party to rock the car AGAIN and listen to where exactly it's coming from. Then if you can source a car stathoscope or I'd highly recomend you buy one (only $20approx.) as you'll find it forever useful, pin point exactly where the noise is coming from!

As by checking things willy nilly it will be a long process to fix due to the multitude of things capable of clunking in the rear end. From something as major as subframe bushes to something as minor as a handbrake cable touching the fuel tank!

Oh and just for the record, "Whell", as in your post doesn't have an "H" in it.

yes..

you have to have it jacked up to chech those ball joints/tie rod ends.. just try and rock the wheel from side to side.(as if your trying to move the rack in and out)

but mine a rooted and there not noisy :

you never know its probably just the exhaust hitting on something :P

for a suspension member to be making noise its gotta be heaps farked..so it should stick out fairly obviously...

stathoscope lol you mean stethascope dont you champ

You just can't help but make a fool of yourself! Before I failed year two, I was given a dictionary. Maybe you should invest in one before you bag people!

Stethoscope, noun. Instrument for listening to action of heart, lungs etc. Stethoscopic is the adjective!

English leason over!

I wish you good luck and bid you fair well. It's been very educational.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Driveability will be about the same with either externally venting BOV, or no BOV at all. Perhaps worse one way than the other, with me thinking that the definitely more flow going through the AFM through a venting BOV more likely to cause rich stalls than the perhaps more flow that the AFM might read on reversion. There is no such thing as "turbo damage" from not having a BOV at stock, or even quite a lot higher than stock, power levels. You need a big turbo with a lot of mass spinning hard getting a horrible slowdown from a slammed shut throttle before there is anything like the shaft loads required to damage things. Not an issue on small turbos. The ONLY 2 reasons that Nissan put a recirc valve onto the RB were: It is a bypass valve. It is open when under vacuum. When not on boost, it bypasses intake air forward around the compressor, which unloads the compressor, allowing the turbine to sping more freely, making the whole lot a bit more efficient when just puddling around. Throttle response should also be faster via the shorter, smaller diameter BOV pipe (when in NA, ie before the BOV closes and boost is building) which is nicer for driveability. Emissions. The reversion causes CO pulses. Eliminate the reversion (or at least, keep it away from the AFM) and you don't get that. The stalling/driveability aspect could have been tuned around, as shown one example of by dose above, if Nissan hadn't put a recirc valve on. Many many turbo engines before the RB had no BOV. They did not stall. See the RB30 turbo as an example. Nistune is definitely better than just stock ECU. It allows you to access and change things that are not excellent on the stock setup, and allows you to do mods like put decent injectors in, relocate the AFM, put a bigger turbo or even cams, etc, on, change to coil swith completely different swell needs, etc etc. All the things that you might need or want to do 25 years after the car was new. Aftermarket replacement ECU is obviously better again, because it gives you even more freedom from the constraints of the stock ECU. I won't be needing to go any further than Nistune though, for the new turbo in the 250ish rwkW region I'm going to, with big injectors, and most other things being stockish.
    • Lucky the prp block is supposed to be released next weekend 
    • Wow guys thank you very much for the HUGE info :-) @GTSBoy I have like 30 minutes if test drive with that car/engine and it not stalled once. IMO it ran very smooth so i guess it was not that bad(but asi i said it is stock) That atmo BoV is worse than no BoV or in my case or it is/will be the same? Cuz frankly i rather have little whooosh sound than that sututu 😄 But either way the less harmfull for engine/turbo the better(if the stock is not an option right away) Yeah about that rebuild i talk with guy who will be doing swap and custom pipes...i think i can get stock BoV or get aftermarket which will function the same. Yeah i looked at that R35 option and i try ask my mechanic more about that if he knows. The engine has stock ECU but i can get Nistune for it. On that stock it runs quite well...but i have limited time with it so rly dont know. Ecumaster is this https://www.ecumaster.com/  It is not some dodgy backyard ECU :-)  @MBS206 Yeah but it will be better to have Nistune than the completely stock ECU no? About that "same" atmo/no BoV. The drivebility would be the same? I dont know but i kinda guess that amto BoV would cause more problems than no BoV in my case? Or is the same? You just "change" one sound for the other? Yeah i read many many many topic about hurting the turbo. But no one know anybody that would 100% tell that his turbo/engine blows/get damaged by not running BoV. Of course turbo would be little happier IMO if it has BoV ..but if you do not trash i think i should be good. And as you can see iam already trying to get this right...just working what i have right now :-) Yeah iam kinda the same...i dont want nothing loud and frankly iam not liking that sututu noise that much 😄 i rather have little bit of "whooosh" or no sound at all. Of course in my case it si a completely another world when you came tu Turbo car with open air box and no BoV and you driving the N/A ...all i hear is engine. Here? I heard turbo/sucking and that sututu 😄 @Yeetus So in my case it is really no difference to run no BoV or some atmo BoV like GReddy FV2? The car would drive the same and has "the same" little problems? As i wrote above i kinda thinked that atmo BoV with stock MAF would cause more problems...but then again i dont know much about no BoV either :-)  So to avoid stalling i "cant" just put neutral on stop lights like from higher rpm? Or? Yeah iam already looking for ECU :-)  Yes iam at the same side with thar R35 MAF :-)  @Dose Pipe Sutututu Thank you i (my mechanic/tuner) will look into that) Guess iam taking the Nistune at least :-) 
    • Here's the workaround with Nistune I was talking about, just add in more timing on the decel table And play around with the fuel cut & recovery, it's enough to stop it from stalling on a decel  
    • Hi Apex and welcome! 
×
×
  • Create New...