Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys,

Recently upgraded to a Apexi FMIC which means i now need to remove my pod for my car to be semi legal ;p

in regards to putting an airbox back on can i use one of those carbon / fibreglass boxes which are called cold air boxes?

im trying to find out what the best possible thing i could do, ive heard that the stock airbox will be better for the car as the car would be breathing from the cooler and not the pod / airbox thus creating better airflow....please tell me if that is a false statement.

Any help would be greatly appreciated as im new to the world of modifications and loving learning as much as i can.

Thanks

Hi Guys,

Recently upgraded to a Apexi FMIC which means i now need to remove my pod for my car to be semi legal ;p

in regards to putting an airbox back on can i use one of those carbon / fibreglass boxes which are called cold air boxes?

im trying to find out what the best possible thing i could do, ive heard that the stock airbox will be better for the car as the car would be breathing from the cooler and not the pod / airbox thus creating better airflow....please tell me if that is a false statement.

Any help would be greatly appreciated as im new to the world of modifications and loving learning as much as i can.

Thanks

ok, if you're in VIC you can only have 1 intake modification, which it seems you know anyway. However, having a cold air box around a pod is still an intake modification. Therefore either that or the fmic will have to be removed. The only way you can legally have an fmic is to have a stock airbox installed...period. I would personally put a good panel filter into your stock airbox. Trust me it will still go very well, maybe a little down in top end and "whoosh" sound..lol, but not really that bad. Think of it this way: An fmic will outweigh any negatives of putting a stock airbox on.

damn you guys over east get taken hard! 1 intake mod??

Oh well, it seems an aftermarket panel filter works very well compared to a pod anyway so your performance loss would be very minimal, if anything id say.

Yeah but the whole issue in VIc is not whether the pod is boxed or not, it's the EPA restricting intake modifications to one only. Whether it's boxed or not, if it's not stock and you have a fmic dont whinge when you get epa'd.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...