Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Once again I find myself at a loss with the damn search button. Perhaps I'm using it wrong, I don't know but I can never turn up anything even remotely related to what I need to know with it :D So here goes.

Just pulled my ECU out and ran the diag. Only error code that came up was 54, which is "Auto signal to ECU" I believe. My car was previously an auto, as is quite obvious due to the original auto dash still being there, with the auto gear position lights and power light and all!! I would have assumed the auto ECU would have been changed for a manual ECU when the conversion was done (Which was, as far as I can tell, in 1998, well before import in 2005). This is however, obviously not the case.

My question is, is this a problem? Should I worry about having an auto ECU in a manual? Should I go out immediately and get a manual ECU and change it over? If I do, will anything else cease to function?

Thanks in advance.

Ben.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/122254-r32-auto-ecu-in-a-manual/
Share on other sites

Once again I find myself at a loss with the damn search button. Perhaps I'm using it wrong, I don't know but I can never turn up anything even remotely related to what I need to know with it :D So here goes.

Just pulled my ECU out and ran the diag. Only error code that came up was 54, which is "Auto signal to ECU" I believe. My car was previously an auto, as is quite obvious due to the original auto dash still being there, with the auto gear position lights and power light and all!! I would have assumed the auto ECU would have been changed for a manual ECU when the conversion was done (Which was, as far as I can tell, in 1998, well before import in 2005). This is however, obviously not the case.

My question is, is this a problem? Should I worry about having an auto ECU in a manual? Should I go out immediately and get a manual ECU and change it over? If I do, will anything else cease to function?

Thanks in advance.

Ben.

No it shouldnt be a issue.

If anything you should get more power as in the R33 the auto ecu ran a little leaner then the manual which gives you more power (not sure about r32 but it should work)

Remember the auto is controlled by another ECU.

the only real difference i can see and have heard is the idle is a bit higher man....i have the same in mine. runs fine....and the diff helps too

Thanks for the reassurance :rofl:

So you're saying the auto diff has a different final ratio than the manual??? Is it higher or lower, meaning more geared towards accelleration or top end speed? Sorry for the shoddy question, I'm just not sure which way diff gearings work :D If someone could explain that too, I'd appreciate :rofl: (Like, is 4.11 a more top speed or better accellerating ratio than 3.08?)

Ben.

Thanks for the reassurance :rofl:

So you're saying the auto diff has a different final ratio than the manual??? Is it higher or lower, meaning more geared towards accelleration or top end speed? Sorry for the shoddy question, I'm just not sure which way diff gearings work :D If someone could explain that too, I'd appreciate :rofl: (Like, is 4.11 a more top speed or better accellerating ratio than 3.08?)

Ben.

Yeah better acceleration it seems to me, 4 and a 3 in the ratio somewhere i think...it is on the plate under your hood. and yeah it will runs ever so slighty rich, not enough to worry about i still get 500 out of a tank. Not quite sore how the ratios work cant member. But a better accel cause the auto has the gearing for cruising....at 100 in my auto was at about 2500 now at 3000 in manual.

The higher the ratio the more rpm your car will do on the freeway to maintain a certain speed.

eg. 4.1:1 5th gear 100kms hr 3000 rpm

3.8:1 5th gear 100klm hr 2800 rpm

These are only examples not accurate measurments.

The 4.1:1 will accelerate faster but use slightly more fuel.

Cheers Michael...

The higher the ratio the more rpm your car will do on the freeway to maintain a certain speed.

eg. 4.1:1 5th gear 100kms hr 3000 rpm

3.8:1 5th gear 100klm hr 2800 rpm

These are only examples not accurate measurments.

The 4.1:1 will accelerate faster but use slightly more fuel.

Cheers Michael...

Thanks mate, that's what I was looking for.

Higher ratio = faster accelleration and lower top speed.

Lower ratio = slower accelleration and higher top speed :P

Ben.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Did you panel beat the dents or have you tried to repair this only using filler?  Is your sanding block soft/flexible and is following the shape of the panel rather then just knocking down the high points? 
    • I haven't knocked them down yet. I think I made the repair more complex than it should have been. I had rock chips combined with waviness and dents and I tackled it all in one because it was near each other and just end up wasting a bunch of bog lol. I'll knock down those areas and see how I go. And yep what you are saying at the end is correct. I think I might be sanding the top of a steep hill then my sanding block falls into the dent and gets rid of the guidecoat if that makes sense. Though shouldnt unless I'm covering too big of an area with not a long enough block. I'll try something new and provide some updates. Getting there though! Thanks as always.  
    • Yeah makes sense, hard to comment on your situation without seeing what your doing. I was talking generally before, I would not be looking to randomly create low spots with a hammer to then have to fill them.  It's hard without seeing what your doing, it sounds like you are using the guide coat to identify low spots, as you're saying the panel is still wavy. I don't see how you're not ending up with patches of guide coat remaining in a wavy panel? Once the high spots are knocked down to the correct level, surely to have a wavy panel you need low spots. And those low spots would have guide coat still in them?
    • So I'll put filler past the repair area a bit to make sure I don't miss anything. Then I'll block it until it's almost level, put the guidecoat, then keep blocking until it's gone. Then it's still wavy.  In regards to hitting the panel, I saw this video might give more context - Skip to 0:47 he knocks it down. But yeah I'm sanding until the guidecoat is gone then checking because otherwise my filler is still well above the bodyline. Unless what you're saying is I should put guidecoat around it early, surrounding the filler then stip once it's gone?
    • I refreshed the OEM injectors with the kit and connected it up. It now ideals okay even with the IACV removed. Driving still has the same cutoff issue like the 550cc injectors so the issue is somewhere else. I bought FPG's Fuel Pump Hanger. I will be installing it next, but it is not as straightforward as I thought it was with my limited wiring knowledge and no instruction on the specific model I purchased (FPG-089). I also got the incorrect billet clamp as I could not find info on the OEM sizing.
×
×
  • Create New...