Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 67
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Wolverine: yeah,they use an afm to control mixtures. on the neos though,there's a map sensor that's there to monitor boost,and the ecu then triggers the cut at the level I mentioned earlier,as reported by my the peak hold on my digital boost gauge. if Sk can sucessfully dispute this,great,maybe I'll learn something.

Alex: if the cut is actually the AFM hitting 5v,how do you guys with larger turbos handle the problem? are you running Z32 AFMs? guys with far more power than my car makes have been running the std AFM for a long time and still have plenty of resolution left in their airflow maps.

I've felt an AFM 5v cut out before on an S14 I owned a while back,and it's way more savage than what the neo does at EXACTLY 1.0kg/cm3 of boost.

it's a limiter in the ecu. anyone who doubts this is welcome to meet me somewhere and experience it for themselves.

Justin...

It is not the AFM maxing out but its the AFM registering an AF that is too high for a specific rpm/load.

THis is based on the std tune which is given.

What a DFA/SAFC does is "bends" the AFM voltage to trick the ecu in thinking there is a lower air flow than there is (this is OK as the std mapping runs rich anyway). So there is a certain % gain you can have with an AFM bender. Basically, these electronic units are variable resistors with multiple load points

Wolverine: yeah,they use an afm to control mixtures. on the neos though,there's a map sensor that's there to monitor boost,and the ecu then triggers the cut at the level I mentioned earlier,as reported by my the peak hold on my digital boost gauge. if Sk can sucessfully dispute this,great,maybe I'll learn something.

Alex: if the cut is actually the AFM hitting 5v,how do you guys with larger turbos handle the problem? are you running Z32 AFMs? guys with far more power than my car makes have been running the std AFM for a long time and still have plenty of resolution left in their airflow maps.

I've felt an AFM 5v cut out before on an S14 I owned a while back,and it's way more savage than what the neo does at EXACTLY 1.0kg/cm3 of boost.

it's a limiter in the ecu. anyone who doubts this is welcome to meet me somewhere and experience it for themselves.

Justin...

A quick explanation on “boost cut” and R34’s / Stagea S2’s;

1 The ECU cuts NOTHING, fuel still flows and the ignition still fires, so calling it a “CUT” is 100% wrong.

2. The R34/S2 ECU is a bit smarter than the previous versions, but like them, it still has Rich and Retard mapping that it reverts to when it detects something amiss. For example if the throttle position and the rpm don’t agree with the AFM voltage the ECU hops into R&R mapping.

3. The ECU doesn’t care about boost. If you fit an SAFC/DFA (or equivalent) you don’t get R&R mapping. If the ECU cared about boost then fitting an AFM voltage bender wouldn’t work

4. Combining #2 and #3 above, you use an AFM voltage bender to realign the AFM voltage with the throttle and rpm. So the ECU thinks that all is well and doesn’t get into R&R mapping.

I hope that clears up the fallacy of boost cut and Skylines/Stageas.

:D cheers :dry:

fair enough. so.....what's the MAP sensor there for? purely for the optional gauges that aren't an option on the stagea?

while we're talking the whole panic mode thing in the ecu,I've seen that before as well,at about half as much boost as I currently run,as I had too much base advance dialled in at the CAS (thanks CRD...). if it detects pinging,it winds the boost and timing back,and goes rich,as you've described.

that isn't what happens at 1.0kg. it CUTS.

like I said,you're more than welcome to experience it for yourself,and then talk to me about it.

Peter at Advan refers to it as a boost cut,and was adamant about why it's there,and why they don't run a std turbo above it.

I may be a newbie to you guys,but I've been around cars (nissans and otherwise) for quite a while now,and actually know a thing or two. being that I'm also a qualified mechanic,I reckon there's a chance that I have at least half an idea about what I'm saying.

if I'm not sure of something,I'll say so.

if I say it's a cut,there's a VERY good chance that's what it is.

anyway,the offer is there mate,and I'd actually not mind your input.

I'll be putting my car on the rollers on sunday. if you want to meet up and have a chat about this,pm me,and i'll let you know where I'll be.

Justin...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Intake manifold is not a part of the issue. The turbo bolts to the exhaust manifold. That is easy. But close your eyes and picture the physical situation. That is a T3 flange on the manifold and a T3 flange on the turbo. As long as any new turbo has a T3 flange on the exhaust housing, that exhaust housing will bolt to the exhaust manifold. This places the exhaust housing in the same place as the stock one. But now move your mental attention a little further forward. The location of the compressor housing is set by the length of the turbo's core. The stock turbo had a long core. Let's say that it is..... 100mm long. So that would place the compressor housing 100mm forward of the exhaust housing. But a highflow, might well have a centre core that is shorter. Let's say that it is only 70mm long. Now the compressor housing will be 30mm further back in the engine bay than the stock one. This DOES move the turbo's compressor outlet backwards. It also moves the compressor's inlet backwards. You will very likely have to do some work to both the inlet and outlet piping to make everything connect again. I am not say this to make it out to be a bigger deal than it is. I am just pointing out that "bolt on" is sometimes not quite bolt on. The highflow from GCG that Murray linked above (https://gcg.com.au/turbo-charger-upgrade-skyline-gtst-2iu-xtrgts-s1.html ) uses a core that is the same length as the stock core, and so does not require this extra work. It will look very much like the stock turbo. No-one uses GTR turbos of any flavour (stock, or aftermarket) in a single turbo application on RB20/25. It's not a thing. Yes, people have been putting on GT3076, GTX3076 (and bigger and smaller versions of those) and G30s (of various sizes) onto RB20/25 since forever. But these are not "bolt on". Everything except the 4 bolts to the exhaust manifold change with these. And genuine Garretts are expensive. Non-gen, like Pulsar, etc, are cheaper, variously as good or nearly as good. But still not bolt on. No-one in the right mind would pay for an HKS turbo. Not in this modern day and age. Well, yes, the GCG highflow. You could ask HG what he can do to make the compressor housing sit in the original location. There are surely others doing highflows around the world. And some of the eBay/Temu ones (as reported by Dose) work and don't die. Bit of a lottery though. I would send your turbo to GCG (here in Oz) to be highflowed if you want a trivial no-extra-work option. But seriously, the work required to change inlet and outlet piping is not that hard. That's a boost control problem, not a turbo problem.
    • Thank you all for the replys 🙂 I know that intake would be different but that is one pipe at it is not that hard to get(custom one). I meant mainly bolt to the stock manifold and the turbo elbow. I looked and many sites/forums but they are just "old" with some old HKS turbos from GT-R i guess? What about some Garrets?  Or any other turbo? Is there even a turbo which i can just bolt on? 😄 And yeah i know about that new HKS but that is like 2000k USD without taxes/shipping in here   Iam getting a touch up tune but my "problem" is that on the "not" hot day iam getting peaks around 0,9 bar...and when it was around 15 Celsious i saw peak around 1 bar which is just too much for stock turbo. And of course turbo is old and i like to get some new one for a piece of mind 🙂 
    • I'm working on the assumption that our friend Jasmine here is a Russian (or, possibly Ukrainian) spammer/spambot, based purely on the number of such that I have been having to neuter in the last few weeks. IP address for the OP above was in WA. But that could have been via VPN. Posting at quarter to 4 in the morning is a good sign of being from somewhere in Europe. The last Jasmine that I kicked in the cooch was IP addressed in Ukraine. Even that could have been via VPN, and the bitchbot could have been from Russia, Serbia, China or anywhere. Regardless, was a spambot, so I killed it with fire. The fact that our new friend Jasmine here did not respond in any way to my tart query strongly suggests to me that this OP was just the establishment phase of a user able to be activated for spamming in a week, or 3 or 10.
    • The stock manifold is "mostly" divided. The divider actually has a notch cut out of it where it would meet the divider on a twin scroll housing. I have no idea why. But whatever the reason, it would cause some cross talk when used with a twin scroll housing. People do put twin scroll housings onto that manifold. But I'm of the opinion that proper twin scroll internal gating is...not really possible at this scale. You'd be throwing good effort (ie $$) after bad, when you really should be doing something else. Notwithstanding that.... I am not sure what the idea that you are floating has to do with the difference in comp cover position caused by the highflow using a shorter length core than the stock Hitachi one. Can you clarify what you meant?
    • Majority of regulars are > 30. We all act at least 50. Definitely not friendly as we're all grumpy. 😛
×
×
  • Create New...