Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Thought i'd throw up a few pics of the twin turbo setup im currently running.

HKS designed the twin T3G's specifically for 1J's for good response with good top end also. Almost all other small turbos are .64 rear housing minimum which when in a twin setup is too large for a 2.5L engine. The T3G's are like an S15 GT28 but with 360 degree thrust bearings instead of ball bearings. They also have a .49 rear housing so they are far more responsive than twin GT series or big single equiped cars.

The dyno sheet is for the current setup but with std ecu, tuning and fuel system.

It's now making 275KW at the wheels with Power FC, fuel pump and injectors. I'll try to post the new sheet up next week when we get it back on the rollers. Will have new boost controller too, so it should hit 300KW.

They are tubular high mount manifolds, hand-made. Intercooler piping, oil and water lines are all custom and were made by exhaust technology in adelaide. Dumps have split pipes for wastegates and are 3". You can see oxygen sensor has been moved to after the Y-piece which brings the system to single 3". Intercooler piping is twin 2" into single 3".

I have a receipt for $4500 for the fitting of the system which included oil and water lines, the re-making of one dump pipe as it didnt fit correctly, exhaust intergration and intercooler piping (and BOV fitment). The turbos, manifolds and dumps were an additional $3000.

I would include when selling the kit

turbos

oil and water lines

intercooler piping

exhaust manifolds

dump pipes

extended oxygen sensor

intake pipes and pods

-will also sell the full exhaust with the kit for an extra $600

mandrel bent stainless with hi flo cat and straight thru mufflers.

The setup makes great power with really good low down and midrange. Awesome street setup. I've only done about 2000kms with it but I'm considering selling this setup to go for a big power, all out track setup.

For the entire setup im looking for around $4500.

I've posted up heaps of pics here

Anybody interested please email me.

[email protected]

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...