Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 143
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Errr why did you sell your cat-back for??? Blitz is just as fine. Exhaust brands doesn't really make a difference for me. It's just a thick pipe :dry:

Apparently different brands have their unique way of wielding which people believe might make a difference in power. I really don't think it makes much difference.

When you have had a blitz system on your car, id like to hear your response to that...

They are not all the same. This thing was great flowing but with flow comes noise.

Edited by PAV34

post-16424-1158049570.jpg post-16424-1158049696.jpg

clear is much better! did u do the front aswell i go shit comp cant see it

any1 wanna buy my front bar PM me not bad 2 cracks :ermm: dw black stuff is texa will wash off as it was going 2 be cut to fit other car but dont wont to cut it anymore

i put my clear indicator lights on. i was pleased.

but ill let u decide.

after:

post-29391-1157987451.jpg

what do u guys think??

Looks great, yes it is an improvement. Your R34 looks :D. Looks quite low, what is your ride height? What suspension/springs/shocks do you have? Are they 19" or 20" rims and what offset?

Out of interest, what cat back system are you all running & do you like it?

I have Apexi 3" cat back and it is quite as, maybe a little too quite. :) I brought the car like that so dont have any comparison. I am wanting to add a dump pipe from turbo to cat, any suggestions? It is an R34 GTT sedan.

Looks great, yes it is an improvement. Your R34 looks :). Looks quite low, what is your ride height? What suspension/springs/shocks do you have? Are they 19" or 20" rims and what offset?

hi

thanks :D , i think the clear lights make a major difference.

funny i wish it could go lower!! im sitting on legal limit 100mm. I think the wheels take a big part on my ride!

i have 19" but not sure of the offset, i cant go any lower (maybe on the rear :mad: ) due to the inside guards rubbing on bumps. The tyres are 235 @ front & 275 @ rear. so its tight.

cheers

steve

funny i wish it could go lower!! im sitting on legal limit 100mm. I think the wheels take a big part on my ride!

i have 19" but not sure of the offset, i cant go any lower (maybe on the rear :huh: ) due to the inside guards rubbing on bumps. The tyres are 235 @ front & 275 @ rear. so its tight.

cheers

steve

I would love that set up!! Perfect. I dont want to go lower that 100mm though cause I want to stay legal, dont need the hassles. Do you compromise on comfort being so low?? The 19" look ace, I want ROH Vapors in 19"!! :blush:

Yeah it makes it easier to drive knowing its on legel height, plus the exhaust just needs to be tucked up as close to body as possible. Thats all i did.

its still a comfortable ride, considering i drove a VL holden for 6 years b4 i bought the 34. it sometimes rubs on the inner front guard a little when driving fast around bends.

but a swaybar upgrade could be a solution :ermm:

i love the power of these cars

it makes me feel like dancn :PBJ:

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Input shaft bearing. They all do it. There is always rollover noise in Nissan boxes - particularly the big box. Don't worry about it unless it gets really growly.
    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
×
×
  • Create New...