Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

If the thing flows a bit better, flows more evenly and is better at equalising cylinder filling across all cylinders...doesnt it stand to reason that a "weaker" cylinder will not ping earlier then the "better" cylinders...maximising the effeciency of the engine?

Don't forget a turbo acts like a fuel pump. It only pushes air. It requires a restriction to create boost pressure. It is moreso the boost pressure combined with the flow of the turbo which determines volumetric efficiency. The smallest area the air must get through is the valve space. There is no 'weak' cylinder as they are not all on intake at the same or similar times. It is the turbo which must continue to push air once the valve opens and there is a pressure drop in the system. If the turbo fails to provide a volume of air suffiecient to fill all cylinders at once then it will not be able to keep up at high rpm, air speed is reduced and power drops. What the design of the plenum does is maximise the 'efficient' space that the turbo can store air before the valve opens. Go too big and you will suffer in the lower end of the rev range for torque but increase your max rpm potential....go too small and the inverse is true. Usually a good plenum size is around twice the capacity of the engine. Runner length also has a major role to play in choosing a plenum/intake manifold as you want to achieve maximum torque at a desired rpm. The longer the runners, the lower the rpm you will have your torque band....and the same applies for this as the plenum in that you don't want to go too far. Runner design is important in that if you just weld some pipe to a barrel, you won't need to put it on a dyno for me to tell you it's not going to be efficient. Instead, bell mouth runners inside the plenum that taper down to the inlet port of the cyliner head to increase air speed as it enters the cylinder head is the better option. Once again there are more factors that play here and also protrusion of the runners into the plenum, diameter of runners, plenum shape, throttle body size in comparison to plenum size and then all of the above compared to engine capacity and whether or not it's forced inducted or not.

As you can see there is much more then just size and shape.....it's not always a case of what looks good, works well. I'm not saying that the aforementioned plenum does not work....I have not seen it or inside it for that matter. Just the usual educate the masses and help them make their own decision saga. Yunno the one about the 'teach a man to fish'. lol

  • Replies 63
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Nice work, but how do you fish? That makes sense though what you said dan. I dare say it would make a difference, but to actually compare the before and after would be a better scenario, and also to compare b and a for any car for that matter would give a much better proven result so we can accept closure on this matter. On that note more than one car would have to prove this statement whether nay or yay it does actually improve results by that much. I dare say that IF there were more people willing to actually go through with this and share results of before and after would be of most benefitial for all of us not alone the plazmaman plenum dealer.

Cheers A

Don't forget a turbo acts like a fuel pump. It only pushes air. It requires a restriction to create boost pressure. It is moreso the boost pressure combined with the flow of the turbo which determines volumetric efficiency. The smallest area the air must get through is the valve space. There is no 'weak' cylinder as they are not all on intake at the same or similar times. It is the turbo which must continue to push air once the valve opens and there is a pressure drop in the system. If the turbo fails to provide a volume of air suffiecient to fill all cylinders at once then it will not be able to keep up at high rpm, air speed is reduced and power drops. What the design of the plenum does is maximise the 'efficient' space that the turbo can store air before the valve opens. Go too big and you will suffer in the lower end of the rev range for torque but increase your max rpm potential....go too small and the inverse is true. Usually a good plenum size is around twice the capacity of the engine. Runner length also has a major role to play in choosing a plenum/intake manifold as you want to achieve maximum torque at a desired rpm. The longer the runners, the lower the rpm you will have your torque band....and the same applies for this as the plenum in that you don't want to go too far. Runner design is important in that if you just weld some pipe to a barrel, you won't need to put it on a dyno for me to tell you it's not going to be efficient. Instead, bell mouth runners inside the plenum that taper down to the inlet port of the cyliner head to increase air speed as it enters the cylinder head is the better option. Once again there are more factors that play here and also protrusion of the runners into the plenum, diameter of runners, plenum shape, throttle body size in comparison to plenum size and then all of the above compared to engine capacity and whether or not it's forced inducted or not.

As you can see there is much more then just size and shape.....it's not always a case of what looks good, works well. I'm not saying that the aforementioned plenum does not work....I have not seen it or inside it for that matter. Just the usual educate the masses and help them make their own decision saga. Yunno the one about the 'teach a man to fish'. lol

LOL...yeh all very good. You have read some texts on manifold desing...but none of what you have said is specific to the RB25 or manifold in question :)

Doesnt change the fact that if you pull the plugs on a std RB they are never the same...you are tuning based around the average of the air the cylinders are consuming and the fuel youre dumping in them. Even then you are only tuning based around the fuel coming out of all the cylinders. One cylinder will be detonating before the others...that limits the ignition/tune you can get into the engine.

You dont need an engine dyno and Motec logging individual cylinders (though speak to those that have set up their RBs on dynos with Motec and they do actually use the individual cylinder injector settings)...the plugs tell you that not all is right. Could also be the fact that cylinder 6 runs the hottest, could be the injector rail isnt equal for all cylinders. Could be the airflow in the manifolds is a compromise....and a better manifold specifically design for a performance application on RBs can help get around this problem

Anyway...i dont really care...need to do some numbers and see whether i should go Plazmaman or jsut go RB26 head

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I'm looking for some real world experiences/feed back from anyone who has personally ran a EFR7670 with a 1.05 exhaust housing or a .83 I'm leaning towards the .83 because its a street car used mostly for spirited driving in the canyons roads. I"m not looking for big numbers on paper. I want a responsive powerband that will be very linear to 8000 rpm. I dont mind if power remains somewhat flat but dont want power to drop off on top. The turbo I've purchased is a 1.05, although the mounting flange T3 vs T4 and internal vs external waste gates are different on both housings, I not concern about swapping parts or making fabrication mods to get what I want. Based on some of the research I've done with chat gpt, the 1.05 housing seems to be the way to go with slightly more lag and future proofing for more mods but recommends .83 for best response/street car setup. AI doesn't have the same emotions as real people driving a GTR so I think you guys will be able to give me better feed back 😀   
    • Surely somebody has one in VIC. Have you asked at any shops?  Is this the yearly inspection or did you get a canary?
    • This is where I share pain with you, @Duncan. The move to change so many cooling system pieces to plastic is a killer! Plastic end tanks and a few plastic hose flanges on my car's fail after so little time.  Curious about the need for a bigger rad, is that just for long sessions in the summer or because the car generally needs more cooling?
    • So, that is it! It is a pretty expensive process with the ATF costing 50-100 per 5 litres, and a mechanic will probably charge plenty because they don't want to do it. Still, considering how dirty my fluid was at 120,000klm I think it would be worth doing more like every 80,000 to keep the trans happy, they are very expensive to replace. The job is not that hard if you have the specialist tools so you can save a bit of money and do it yourself!
    • OK, onto filling. So I don't really have any pics, but will describe the process as best I can. The USDM workshop manual also covers it from TM-285 onwards. First, make sure the drain plug (17mm) is snug. Not too tight yet because it is coming off again. Note it does have a copper washer that you could replace or anneal (heat up with a blow torch) to seal nicely. Remove the fill plug, which has an inhex (I think it was 6mm but didn't check). Then, screw in the fill fitting, making sure it has a suitable o-ring (mine came without but I think it is meant to be supplied). It is important that you only screw it in hand tight. I didn't get a good pic of it, but the fill plug leads to a tube about 70mm long inside the transmission. This sets the factory level for fluid in the trans (above the join line for the pan!) and will take about 3l to fill. You then need to connect your fluid pump to the fitting via a hose, and pump in whatever amount of fluid you removed (maybe 3 litres, in my case 7 litres). If you put in more than 3l, it will spill out when you remove the fitting, so do quickly and with a drain pan underneath. Once you have pumped in the required amount of clean ATF, you start the engine and run it for 3 minutes to let the fluid circulate. Don't run it longer and if possible check the fluid temp is under 40oC (Ecutek shows Auto Trans Fluid temp now, or you could use an infrared temp gun on the bottom of the pan). The manual stresses the bit about fluid temperature because it expands when hot an might result in an underfil. So from here, the factory manual says to do the "spill and fill" again, and I did. That is, put an oil pan under the drain plug and undo it with a 17mm spanner, then watch your expensive fluid fall back out again, you should get about 3 litres.  Then, put the drain plug back in, pump 3 litres back in through the fill plug with the fitting and pump, disconnect the fill fitting and replace the fill plug, start the car and run for another 3 minutes (making sure the temp is still under 40oC). The manual then asks for a 3rd "spill and fill" just like above. I also did that and so had put 13l in by now.  This time they want you to keep the engine running and run the transmission through R and D (I hope the wheels are still off the ground!) for a while, and allow the trans temp to get to 40oC, then engine off. Finally, back under the car and undo the fill plug to let the overfill drain out; it will stop running when fluid is at the top of the levelling tube. According to the factory, that is job done! Post that, I reconnected the fill fitting and pumped in an extra 0.5l. AMS says 1.5l overfill is safe, but I started with less to see how it goes, I will add another 1.0 litres later if I'm still not happy with the hot shifts.
×
×
  • Create New...