Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

No mark dont go any lower than 20k..

there is another guy selling hes better than average 32 for 19 and its still runnin a rb20 and only runnin 170rwkw.

If someone gets this car for 20,000 they will relise its worth every dollar spent.

Well i still think u shouldnt sell at all.. cauz if u do it makes the number of skylines boys at beacy pizza 3.

good luck,

kev.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/130416-sold/page/2/#findComment-2491973
Share on other sites

Just wondering were the any legal dramas with the conversion? Did you need and engineers cert? How was insuring it with the new engine? I ask because i would love to do the same thing with a 32.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/130416-sold/page/2/#findComment-2546447
Share on other sites

Thanks Kev :)

Have to catch up soon.

Things were quite simple with the engine conversion.

All I had to do was get a letter from a Nissan Dealership stating

that the RB25 came in the R32 which a select few did and then take the letter to vic roads and they updated their system and sent me a new rego sticker.

I was told that if the motor came out in that model an engineers certificate is not required. Thats why the letter from Nissan was needed to confirm.

Hope that helps :happy:

Mark

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/130416-sold/page/2/#findComment-2547422
Share on other sites

Ay mark i hear u put a deposit on that sss.

I cant say im happy but i will have to wait and see..

oh and i was thinking of gettin damo to switch computers with me to see how my car would go with a remap. was thinkin we would probly do at ur house or somethin. so we willhaee to organise something with damo.

anyways see u sat

ciao

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/130416-sold/page/2/#findComment-2555488
Share on other sites

Hi Kev,

Yes I will be more than happy to help you try out Damo's remapped Ecu.

Anytime you like I will make the time.

It was remapped by Dr Drift whom is on these forums.

The map is for a basic set up ie. exhaust,cooler bit more boost etc...

From memory its about a 15kw at the wheels gain.

You will like the SSS its a 99 model, metalic blue and very very clean.

Its just what I need something smaller, more practical and economical.

Talk to you soon

Ciao :happy:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/130416-sold/page/2/#findComment-2555642
Share on other sites

Hi Kev,

Yes I will be more than happy to help you try out Damo's remapped Ecu.

Anytime you like I will make the time.

It was remapped by Dr Drift whom is on these forums.

The map is for a basic set up ie. exhaust,cooler bit more boost etc...

From memory its about a 15kw at the wheels gain.

You will like the SSS its a 99 model, metalic blue and very very clean.

Its just what I need something smaller, more practical and economical.

Talk to you soon

Ciao :happy:

Well i did the exact opposite....from a 2001 pulsar to 96 R33. Petrol might cost a bit more but its so worth it...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/130416-sold/page/2/#findComment-2555677
Share on other sites

Obviously the Skyline is a better car all round, although at

the moment my priorities are different.

I am after something quiet, soft on the road, more economical and

I want to start saving $$$ for a house.

I found a really nice metalic blue pulsar sss which I should be getting

next week hopefully and at least it has an sr20.

:P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/130416-sold/page/2/#findComment-2559385
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...