Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I had a mate lose a few of my mags and this was one of them The mag was released about about 6-12 months ago.

It had 0-100 times etc..I think they got the r33gtst at 7.1sec saying it was a bit slower than others they had tested.

I wanted to keep this article for down the track etc.

Can anyone do a nice quality scan or something for me..if that is not too hard to get.

Cheers

Im pretty sure ive got that one ... i'll have a look and let you know ... from memory i think they said the skyline was a better pick =)

They say something about the Z having a better motor but a non responsive spahgetti chasis or something like that ... r33 was much more fun to drive =D

end rant

No worries ...

Yup ... im happy with my line :laugh:

With 0-100 times unless you flat change every gear ... most stock lines will be close to that time ...

They thrash f**k out of the cars they get those times out of ...

I'll have a look tomorrow for that mag man ive got to search through a six foot high stack lol (<--- not looking forward to that lol)

I reckon ive spent $1500 ~ $2k on magazines man (<--- thats a high flow or something lol ... )

Yeah I have a bit wrapped in magazines also.

Re. the 0-100 times. Thats why rexys do so well. After driving a few of them they dont feel nearly as quick as the figures. Roll on acceleration the R33 and almost a commodore would probably beat them.

You have to dial in 6k rpm and dump the clutch to go well.

Yeah I have a bit wrapped in magazines also.

Re. the 0-100 times. Thats why rexys do so well. After driving a few of them they dont feel nearly as quick as the figures. Roll on acceleration the R33 and almost a commodore would probably beat them.

You have to dial in 6k rpm and dump the clutch to go well.

How the f**k do you get traction when dumping the clutch at 6000rpm, mines stock and if i did that i just wheelspin and bounce off the rev limiter. And no the tyres aren't shit, toyo proxes.

How the f**k do you get traction when dumping the clutch at 6000rpm, mines stock and if i did that i just wheelspin and bounce off the rev limiter. And no the tyres aren't shit, toyo proxes.

I think he is reffering to the WRX. :(

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
    • I haven’t yet cut the chassis, maybe I switch to a reverse flow. I’ve got the Intercooler mounted as I already had it but not cut yet. Might have to speak to an engineer 
×
×
  • Create New...