Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have purchased a GT30R to fit to my RB25DET with all the associated and upgraded fuel/ecu/cooling neccessities but standard plenum.

Will I see any worth in going for 3" cooler piping as opposed to 2.5"? I have the option available to do, what do you guys think?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/135060-intercooler-piping-size/
Share on other sites

Your throttle body is 2.5", whats the point of having 3" cooler piping if the same amount of air will be going to your intake plenum regardless of 3" piping? all you'll get is more lag if you go with 3", just leave it 2.5" unless you want to upgrade your plenum & throttle body.

Your throttle body is 2.5", whats the point of having 3" cooler piping if the same amount of air will be going to your intake plenum regardless of 3" piping? all you'll get is more lag if you go with 3", just leave it 2.5" unless you want to upgrade your plenum & throttle body.

Exactly right the volume of air required to fill 1 inch more space at your designated boost level = the increased lag time.

Get 2.5inch piping to your standard TB + Plenum, and maybe 3 inch on turbo side if you have a 3inch inlet on your turbo... I dislike reducers so thats just personal preference. Also depends on your cooler inlet/outlet size too.

yep with stock plenum i just ran 2.5" piping, made things heaps easier plus was running less power...with the custom plenum w 80mm TB i run 3 inch on the plenum side but still 2.5 on turbo side. got hardly any lag considering the power

ben...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well you could certainly buy or build an enclosure for a pod in that corner of the bay. It is absolutely vital that there is a nice big opening to let cold air in to it from the front or underside, otherwise it will just pull air in around the edges from the bay, and if that air is hot, you gain nothing from enclosing the pod. There is lots of good evidence around (including on here, see posts by @Kinkstaah for example) showing that pods pulling hot air from the bay is only a problem when you're static or slow in traffic, and that as soon as you get the car up and moving the air being grabbed by the pod cools down. Although that will obviously vary from car to car, whether there is a flow of cold air to the pod or if it all has to come through the radiator area, etc etc. Obviously, the whole exercise requires as much thought as anything else does. Doing the lazy thing will often end up being the dumb thing. The stock GTT airbox has a cold air snorkel to feed it from over the radiator. Shows that Nissan were thinking. The GT airbox is upside down compared to the turbo one, yeah? Inlet at the bottom, AFM/exit on the lid? That might make it harder to route the turbo inlet pipe using the GT airbox than a turbo one. That would probably be the main reason I'd consider not using it, not that it is too small and restrictive. I'm looking at a photo of one now and the inlet opening seems nice and large. Also seems to have the same type of snorkel that the turbo one has. Maybe all that's required is to make a less restrictive snorkel/cold air inlet, perhaps by punching down through the guard like I did.
    • Also seen this as an option 
    • I get you, we’ll see I’m aiming for 200ish kw now and hopefully 300rwkw down the line after some upgrades maybe like headstuds, E85 flex fuel etc  so trying to make it final for that now, I can get a GTT airbox for $280 so it’s not too bad but not sure if there’s better ways to spend that money. I seen online they say pod filter which isn’t enclosed isn’t good especially for a plus T.      hard to say what to do
    • Meh. How much power can you make from a +T anyway? I wouldn't have though it would be enough to challenge the airbox. It's not as if it's tiny compared with the turbo one. As to putting a pod in a stock airbox .... it's not the filter element that would be restrictive. It would be the air inlet to the box that would be the narrow point, which you could open up regardless of what element was inside. On my R32 I opened up the sort of triangular opening in the bottom front corner of the box, deformed (heated, moulded) some 4" stormwater pipe to fit to that opening and punched a 4" hole down through the inner guard to the spot where the stock intercooler used to be. This was purely in the search for a cold intake, but you could do something similar if you need to open up the inlet side of it. The AFM tube size is the same for both NA and turbo, so the outlet from the airbox is same same anyway. If you're going to do the right thing, then an aftermarket ECU won't care about the AFM (ie, you can get rid of it). But even if it was still there, people pull >300rwkW through them all day, and I suspect you won't be going there.
    • R34 RB25de Neo by the way ^ 
×
×
  • Create New...