Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 78
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Saw ya last night nismogod.. Was gonna come say hello, but i dont think you were in the mood or anything..

Anti social are we?? hahaha

Anyways howd you run?? I didnt get to see your times?

Btw how do you obtain pics from the drags?? I noticed a few photographers took pics of my car!!

cheers

u saw me the other night??? i wasnt at the drags this wednesday....i went on the 8th....interesting...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/140333-wsid/page/3/#findComment-2680369
Share on other sites

i couldnt get my hands on some stockies so im running on my 19's. I so wanted to see how much time id take off with the stock rims, mine prob weigh 10kg more each....maybe not quite that much, but u get the idea. what kind of mods have u done to your car?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/140333-wsid/page/3/#findComment-2680964
Share on other sites

OHH really??

Thought it was you, coz there was another white 33 there, and had a huge nismo sticker on the front wind screen.

Thought that was you since your sau name is nismo-god..

Sorry my bad then..

But yea he didnt seem like talking or anything.. Just drove straight past three skylines.. Off in his little own world!!

lol..

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/140333-wsid/page/3/#findComment-2681666
Share on other sites

good to meet u both.....had a ball friday night, 2nd time out there and even better then the first. thanks ben for the wheels, took some time off my pb. best of night on my 19" was 13.700 at 102.5 mph with a 60ft of 2.01. best et was 13.426 at 103.5mph with a 60ft of 1.997. still has more time in it....until next time...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/140333-wsid/page/3/#findComment-2684116
Share on other sites

Easy 10 runs both nites, although weather hasnt been very reliable over the past month so maybe that has been keeping the people away.... if not the drag racing scene has really died in the ass in the past 4-8wks.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/140333-wsid/page/3/#findComment-2684590
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...