Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I think there needs to be a combine effort from all peoples involved.

Governments need/should introduce advance driving course as part of the licensing procedure.

They need to spend more money on safe driving which are aimed at younger kids and not spend it on their erection campains.

I know that the courses can be expensive, but offset that with the fact that with the skills and abilities you gain from them could one day save your life and i think it is affordable to everyone.

The insurance companies can come into the game as well. Maybe offer cheaper insurance for new drivers if they have completed some sort of advance driving course.

And parents need to be apart of this as well. Im not a parent myself so i havent got total insight on the whole father/son/daughter thing. I know that learners these days forge/dodgy the driving hours. Why not take the time or make the effort to take the kids out driving and fill out their books for them, properly. At least you know that your kids are getting the required experience that they need on the roads. Advise them that speeding kills and its not cool to drag the family sedan cos its not designed for it (im not saying that you should be dragging sports cars either).

To sum it up imo i think the best answer to preventing these fatalities is to educate them more and give them the skills they need to survive on our roads.

My mothers work deals with statistics on these issues, and it's be proved an "advance driving course makes you, more at risk of having an accerdent" not sure if this was in gerneral, i think it just related to young drivers (p-platers)

I know that about 3yrs ago when I did my first trackday i realised my skyline had way more grip and better handling than i ever expected.... this gave me heaps more confidence on the road to go faster.

It's like the current water problem, the population increases however the and the inferstructure stays the same, it gets to a point where it's two late and then the powers at be say shit whate are we going to do.

Same with roads, there are just so many more people on the roads, and traffic. P-plators are jus the scape goat, to take the emphsis of another f**k up where the inferstructure isn't there to support growth. They shoudl start looking at them selfs to creat better roads, so the experence drivers as well have less chances of prangs. Manage roadworks/existing roads better minimising traffic and causing ppl to make quick decisions. Building better roads/more roads, or even more tracks to keep "street raceing" of public roads.

it's just the way life is.

no one can prevent accidents from happening. no matter how hard the police try, it's gonna happen. face it, people are going to die. only way u can sort of prevent that is to stop making cars that go faster than 30k/h.

I know that about 3yrs ago when I did my first trackday i realised my skyline had way more grip and better handling than i ever expected.... this gave me heaps more confidence on the road to go faster.

But yet your still around to go faster, you didnt wrap yourself around a pole.

Maybe the track day gave you the skills to hande the car better and gave you insite on the limits of your car.

And confidence is not a bad thing, over confidence and lack of cofindence is.

But having confidence doesnt give you and escuse to drive over the speed limit.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...