Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Finally got my car tuned properly after i found the problem...it was nothing but a leak in my BOV. Before the problem the car was making 175 rwks. after we fixed it, it made 205 kws and once 207rwks. Picked up 30kws cos of that little problem. Thought it mite have been a block cat so i took that off, it wasnt it. Checked the afm, wasnt it. checked if one the blades had come off the turbo and it wasnt it. checked the lines on the boost controller. finally checked the bloody BOV.

Car: 1993 r33 gts-t

Mods: FMIC, BOV, blitz EBC, pod, slpit dump/front pipe, high flow metal body cat, Cat back exhuast, power FC and walbro 500hp fuel pump. tuned at just under 12psi.

post-29367-1161936033.jpg

post-29367-1161936074.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/140673-finally-tuned-and-the-results/
Share on other sites

thanks mate

no it was inside the bov itself. just inside the trumpet, there was a little black thing, so he pulled it off and it was just a rubber seal. i cant tell you nemore, but yeh after that it was fine. i remember before that, i was only starting to build boost at 3000rpm and full boost by 4000. now its boosting in the low-mid 2000rpm and close to full boost somwhere around 3000-3500 rpm. Yeh top end feels better, but mid-range grunt is more surprising.

shouldnt it be making more? you got management etc, i made 196kw on 14psi(with an 18psi spike mid run) mods are same as yours except no cat and no pfc. this is on a rb20 with a suspected vg30 turbo im not trying to put your car down, its just i see these figures and wonder why my very very mild rb20 is up around the level of moderate rb25's

Edited by dead32
shouldnt it be making more? you got management etc, i made 196kw on 14psi(with an 18psi spike mid run) mods are same as yours except no cat and no pfc. this is on a rb20 with a suspected vg30 turbo im not trying to put your car down, its just i see these figures and wonder why my very very mild rb20 is up around the level of moderate rb25's

put it this way, standard trubo rb25det's max power is around 210rkws. A lot of people with the same mods find their power varies between 190-210 rwks depending on a number of factors: dyno, condition of turbo, engine, etc etc. You say you made 196 kws. now you arent too sure on what turbo u used. if you say its has vg30 housing running 14psi is fine and on a rb20det that power figure sounds about rite, but remeber im only running 12 psi becuase its a standard turbo. Also its not just the max power thats important. Ive noticed more power across the entire rev-range.

Edited by moonus
shouldnt it be making more? you got management etc, i made 196kw on 14psi(with an 18psi spike mid run) mods are same as yours except no cat and no pfc. this is on a rb20 with a suspected vg30 turbo im not trying to put your car down, its just i see these figures and wonder why my very very mild rb20 is up around the level of moderate rb25's

What makes you think its a VG30?

The R34 and VG30 turbo's are identical from the outside, the difference being the vg30 runs the small rb20 compressor wheel where as the r34 turbo runs a big motha comp wheel. There is a tip to identifying the sound of one... The VG30 spools quieter, more like a little buzz where as the RB20 and rb25 turbo's are louder and have more of a whooshing sucking sound, the reason for this is their comp cover inlet design.

Essentially from greatest power to less...

1. R34 GTT Turbo

2. R33 Turbo (Series 2 turbo's make same power just spool a little better)

3. VG30 Turbo

4. RB20 Turbo

And if your after maximum response with an ever so slight trade off in peak power... The R33 Series 2 turbo. Will still make up around 190rwkw on 14psi.

Don't be thinking if you throw a pfc in to yours you will make more peak power.. It won't, where you are at is where it will approximately stay. It will however pick up mid range, spool slightly earlier and be quicker simply because there is greater average power. How often are you at your peak power rpm compared to the rpm accelerating TO that peak power rpm. :sick:

EDIT: I see Steve is lurking around SAU quite a lot lately... Are you thinking about jumping back in to a Skyline Steve? hehe :sick:

ahh i get cha moonus, as for you post cubes, i was told by the previous owner it was a vg30, the turbo is deff not quite, it sounds like a realy high pitched whine, going by the boost spike/drop off, on my dyno run's im assuming the turbo has reached its efficiency level, therefore making good boost mid range but unable to flow it at high rpm, with same boost but larger injectors and a pfc i would assume with a deccent tune it would have to make 210-220? or am i dreaming?

ahh i get cha moonus, as for you post cubes, i was told by the previous owner it was a vg30, the turbo is deff not quite, it sounds like a realy high pitched whine, going by the boost spike/drop off, on my dyno run's im assuming the turbo has reached its efficiency level, therefore making good boost mid range but unable to flow it at high rpm, with same boost but larger injectors and a pfc i would assume with a deccent tune it would have to make 210-220? or am i dreaming?

I'd say it may just make that power... but at the end of the day it's still an RB20, so it's not really worth the trouble IN MY OPINION.

BTW, I made the exact same power (196rwkw) with an R33 series one turbo and chipped ECU, so your power output is pretty much the norm

went in this car yesterday!!! amazing difference the power fc has made all round...nice & smooth, barley any lag (compared to before) & pulls hard right through rev range...with traction & a bit of practice should easily get under a 13.5 all day long

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Please ignore I found the right way of installing it thanks
    • There are advantages, and disadvantages to remapping the factory.   The factory runs billions of different maps, to account for sooooo many variables, especially when you bring in things like constantly variable cams etc. By remapping all those maps appropriately, you can get the car to drive so damn nicely, and very much so like it does from the factory. This means it can utilise a LOT of weird things in the maps, to alter how it drives in situations like cruise on a freeway, and how that will get your fuel economy right down.   I haven't seen an aftermarket ECU that truly has THAT MANY adjustable parameters. EG, the VAG ECUs are somewhere around 2,000 different tables for it to work out what to do at any one point in time. So for a vehicle being daily driven etc, I see this as a great advantage, but it does mean spending a bit more time, and with a tuner who really knows that ECU.   On the flip side, an aftermarket ECU, in something like a weekender, or a proper race car, torque based tuning IMO doesn't make that much sense. In those scenarios you're not out there hunting down stuff like "the best way to minimise fuel usage at minor power so that we can go from 8L/100km to 7.3L/100km. You're more worried about it being ready to make as much freaking power as possible when you step back on the loud pedal as you come out of turn 2, not waiting the extra 100ms for all the cams to adjust etc. So in this scenario, realistically you tune the motor to make power, based on the load. People will then play with things like throttle response, and drive by wire mapping to get it more "driveable".   Funnily enough, I was watching something Finnegans Garage, and he has a huge blown Hemi in a 9 second 1955 Chev that is road registered. To make it more driveable on the road recently, they started testing blocking up the intake with kids footballs, to effectively reduce air flow when they're on the road, and make the throttle less touchy and more driveable. Plus some other weird shit the yankee aftermarket ECUs do. Made me think of Kinks R34...
    • I do this, I also don't get the joke  
    • Return flow cooler will be killing you I reckon. You can certainly push more through a low mount setup but they're good numbers for a stock looking engine bay.  Mine made 345rwkw (hub) at 22psi on 98 with a "highflow" on a stock manifold but it's a long way from a normal high flow or standard engine. I used one of those Turbosmart IWG-75's and it was great with the Motec running closed loop boost with pressure being applied to both sides of the diaphragm. 
    • Hey man do you have pic of adaptor plate by any chance I need to match up the bolt holes as my gearbox adaptor plate ones are way off the only bolts of starter motor are matching thanks 
×
×
  • Create New...