Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I had a GReddy Turbo timer installed earlier in the year, the TT came with a speedo in which at time of installation was not setup. I finally found the time to go through and check where the "Purple" wire for the TT actually went to and turns out it was taped in a loop to itself just near the hand break. I need to join this with the cars speedo, but unsure as to which wire that is... does anyone know which wire i would need to join this with in an 1996 R33 GTST Series 2?

Regards

Jamie

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/142003-96-r33-s2-speedo-wire/
Share on other sites

i am also looking to do this.. I am pretty sure we need to do this by runing it off the speedo wire from the std ecu... The purple wire In mine is connected to the hand brake sensor though....for the safety shutoff...I guess it may work if you just bridge that wire from the hand brake to the ecu? as in the manual it says purple is the speedo wire... hmmm.. not to sure which one on the ecu is the speed sensor.

I have same greddy t timer... you can dowload the manual for it from greddy.com.... as mine came with japanese instructions. :)

Turbosmart E-boost 2 manual has the pin-outs and diagrams for heaps of cars including almost all turbo nissan cars specifically for speedo wire. All turbo skylines are included 5meg d/l off turbosmart.com.au

http://www.turbosmart.com.au/index.php?s=f...load&id=108

cheers

Evil

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Input shaft bearing. They all do it. There is always rollover noise in Nissan boxes - particularly the big box. Don't worry about it unless it gets really growly.
    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
×
×
  • Create New...