Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

You missed the point. Nobody said anything about "not enjoying" the horsepower, it's more a case of getting used to it & then wanting to experience that, 'WOW this feels fast' feeling again.

Show pony? I've never entered a car in a car show in my life, not intending to either. I don't give a rats arse if someone has more rwkw than me either. Do I enjoy putting that power to use on the street & strip? Hell yes!

Originally posted by Sydneykid

... whats the point of horsepower if you can't enjoy it... why keep chasing more if you don't enjoy it after 2 weeks.... seems completely stupid... hell, i drive a piss-poor '88 Honda integra everyday, and enjoy it thoroughly everyday. and that's by no means fast....

Point being, if ya don't enjoy it, why the hell bother... or are you all show ponies??

I had my car dynoed just for fun because it only cost me $40 . Made 130rwkw on a 30 degree + day . Dont know what mode it was in , and the car is stock except for a 3" mandrel bent cat back .

Whenever my car "starts feeling slow" , I go take my mums daewoo for a spin . The skyline is heaven on earth after that torture :P

Hi Guys, one of the issues with Shootout mode is ambient air temperature correction. What the dyno does is compensate for the temperature of the day. Lets say its 36 degrees in the dyno room and as we know 8 degrees of temperature is worth 5% in horsepower. So if the dyno corrects the horsepower reading to 20 degrees ambient it adds 10% to the true power reading at the wheels. So the car might only be making 200 rwkw but the dyno will show 220 rwkw because that's what it would have made if the temperature had been 20 degrees instead of 36.

There is also altitude correction, where the dyno allows for its height above sea level. ie; it increases the power readings in an attempt to duplicate the horsepower that the engine would develop if it was at sea level.

Adding these two correction factors together, it is possible to have a car that actually produced 190 rwkw, show 220 rwkw on the dyno chart. The idea is of course to enable comparisons between dyno's in summer and winter and at different locations and therefore altitudes.

Maybe there are some dyno operators out there who use correction factors (there are more than these 2) for other purposes. Then again it could just be that I'm a suspicious kinda guy.

Hope that adds to the discussion.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • When you crank your car, and hit it with a timing light, can you see a steady crank timing?
    • Oh, forgot to add, A few months ago I was getting mixture codes and the car was using crap loads of fuel. You could smell the unburned fuel in the exhaust, it was crazy strong. Economy was over 17.5 l/100 and usually around 19. I smoked the engine and found a leaky CCV hose which I replaced and then I replaced my two pre cat O2 sensors, I also replaced the MAF. This fixed my mixture codes and improved my exonomy but I'm still 14 - 15 l/100 when pottering about town so something is still amiss. Throttle response is much better and it has more pep but I'd like to know why it's still so thirsty (and I'm hoping that whatever it is gives me a bit more poke).    
    • Car is on factory injectors/z32 maf/ q45 throttle body/ z32 ecu with nistune 
    • Hello all, currently finishing up a rb25 swap into my s14. Having issues with starting, car has spark (confirmed by pulling a plug and watching it spark), has fuel(confirmed by checking pulse/voltage at injectors all spark plugs are soaked in fuel). Car cranks over and pops into the exhaust with a heavy fuel smell but no attempt to start or run, I have torn the timing cover off and triple confirmed timing, turned the CAS in multiple spots both directions, attempted to start with coolant temp and maf unplugged, checked my fuel lines and made sure they weren’t backwards, checked voltage at cas/injectors/coilpacks, made sure all the grounds in the harness are connected and added a few grounding straps (1 from chassis to block, 1 from chassis to head, and 1 from chassis to igniter chip) I am getting stumped here. As a last ditch effort I made a full grounding harness tonight that’s going to run from the battery and add an extra ground from the battery onto the coil pack harness/igniter chip/ intake manifold/ Wiring specialties harness ground/ and alternator. I’m hoping maybe the grounding harness will fix it here but posting here to see if anyone has any other ideas on what else I can check. My fuel pressure is unknown right gauge will be here tomorrow.  IMG_3206.mov
    • yeah I was shocked when I checked my spare OEM on and as below that's how they come from Nissan. (side interesting note new NEO gearbox and replacement park lack the brass bush on the tips and its just all alloy) unsure about damage to the box currently back at 1110 to be pulled down/inspected and selector fork replaced as he built it previously and given the never before seen failure on his billet forks he is replacing it under warranty. He said he has used always OEM the keyway tab without issue for years so it could be an unlucky coincidence. I did talk to him about the sharp corners and stress concentration too. Re: hard shifts i got 7+ years out of the OEM one and the fork itself failed not the keyway. so could be bad luck as I said or an age thing + heat cycles in box and during fabrication of billet?
×
×
  • Create New...