Jump to content
SAU Community

*prices Reduced* Car Audio Gear - Pioneer, Boston, Rockford Etc.


Recommended Posts

After having to sell my pride and joy earlier this year (r33 S2), I've only just come to terms with the fact that I also have to sell my audio gear that I ripped out. ;)

These items were installed early 2003 and were taken out in May this year. They haven't seen a great deal of use, as the car was really only driven for short trips.

For sale are:

* Pioneer DEH-P8450MP deck - $350* **SOLD**

* Boston Rally RC620 6.5" splits - $175* **SOLD**

* Rockford Fosgate Punch 200S amp - $150*

* Rockford Fosgate Punch HE RFP3412 12" sub + box - $150*

* Clarion V-Net 450 4 channel amp - $130* **SOLD**

* JVC CH-X1000 12 disc changer (actually from my Fiance's Liberty) - $100 **SOLD**

Would make an excellent starter pack. Originally worth well over $3000

*Special package deal - $800* for the lot!

For more info and pics, please visit the following (dodgy looking) page:

http://www.pnc.com.au/~nathan/caraudio

Pickup from Sydney would be preferred, but other options could be discussed for the serious buyer.

Name: Nathan

Email: [email protected] (preferred contact)

Mobile: 0404 011 857

No low-balling please!!!

Edited by Knat
  • 2 weeks later...

Hey mate,

I don't actually have the gear with me (at the Olds' place). I'll try and get there ASAP to check model numbers etc.

I know what you mean about there not being much on Google. I assure you it does exist though! :)

Clarion amp was sold tonight in an on-the-spot deal - Sorry Foznice.

Deck and stacker are being held.

Still have the Boston splits, Rockford amp and Rockford sub.

umm...the RF amp...wat is the RMS rating bridged?

Rockford Fosgate Punch 200S:

* Channels - 2

* Per channel power - 50 W X 2 @ 4 Ohms RMS,100 W X 2 @ 2 Ohms RMS, 200 W X 1 @ 4 Ohms Bridged RMS

* Total power :400 Watts

* Bridgeable - Yes

Actually still have the test certificate from RF that rates it at 264 W RMS

Would prefer to sell it with the RF sub too.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...