Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Don't mean to sabotage your sale or anything, but it looks like they are leaking, but can't tell from that pic.

Could I please get more pics of them, especially a close up of where the shaft comes out of the shock body for all four of them.

Thanks.

email to [email protected]

Edited by fc3s-infini
Hi everyone i got a GAB coilover to suit R33 GTST like new $750.00

im after some coilovers,

whats all the grease and oil on them for?

have they been tested for leaks...

are they sold yet.

ive had coilovers that have leaked and i can guarantee that these are leaking on the rears

100%

theres no oil around coilovers even when there perfect

sand can stick to the oil and scratch the shaft

its funny how u didnt degrease them before you posted pics :devil:

good luck with your sale

*cough*

that because i want everyone to see what it look like

and i can tell you now that there is no leak if im wrong i give it to you for nothing

seen like you know what you on about and i dont.***cough***

Edited by khmer
  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...