Jump to content
SAU Community

should we build more tracks or crake down on hoons  

54 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

as immature etc as everyone says hooning is, and it is, its also cheap fun and available as soon as u get ur car, and when u turn 17 car+freedom+fun on the cheap is always gonna have every sickflamin mongrel in town kicking it at kk's on saturday nite whats wrong with being 18 and going down to eat donuts and watch nice cars go by with ur freinds.

what this idiot government doesnt realise there isnt a whole fkn lot to do in this country when u are 17-20 something especially if ur not $$ it in.

at the end of the week all i wanna do is drive my car and im sure most of u on here would agree u would like to spend ample time driving ur cars thats why ur on a skyline forum on the net..

hooning has been a problem as long as cars have been around check out the killer race in grease even :)

and as time goes on cars get faster more advanced and cheaper in the year i was born 1983 somebody who was 20 then wouldnt dream of owning a 200rwkw skyline, but now its a reality and normal for p platers to have such cars.

i think all the import owners these days look to japan for cars parts style drift the whole Keiichi Tsuchiya phase.

maybe our government should do the same and have a look how japan is dealing with the situation.

maybe our government should do the same and have a look how japan is dealing with the situation.

Dude thats easy... The japanese all meetup and drift in abandoned parking lots..

Then they drive really fast on the street and if you can go faster than 180 the cops wont chase...

Yes i learn everything from fast n furious movies :)

no amount of tracks is going to stop idiot boy brad from racing bogan boy bob off at the lights and then t boning some poor sod coming outta an intersection 400m's ahead

Dam i think i better change my name :)

Its the mind set thats gotta change, some people think they are invincible and have no consideration for the other road users

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
×
×
  • Create New...