Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey peeps

It appears ive managed to delete some settings from the Power FC by wanting to have a look at them. (IDIOT)

So what i did was reset the power fc and enter the timing/injector values into the tables again (took forever...) but the engine light is still on and the car is still mis-firing abit.

This seems to of happened due to the 'airflow' section which is set on Power intake (100% for all voltage..).

Can ANYONE give me a run down on what could be happening here as the soonest i can get it tuned is early next month due to being booked out :D

Car has air filter, intercooler and full exhaust for referance.

Helppppppp lol

Regards

Jaz

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/152334-power-fc-r34/
Share on other sites

Thats what i thought but i reset the power fc and it ran rough. re-entered old ignition/injector values and its not really much smoother....

Im 110% it has to be somethin to do with that as i messed with it after a drive lsat night and it didn't start up properly since then :D(((

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/152334-power-fc-r34/#findComment-2834074
Share on other sites

Can any of these settings cause a problem?

Airflow - unsure where to put it, its currents on Power Intake, was on R34 Normal and made no real difference.

Injector settings are all at 100%

Accel settings are all standard from the reset aswell as the rest (cranking/water temp/rev/idle).

Anyone?? :D

Oh and the engine light has come on aswell (another indication towards airflow meter problems?).

As i said there is certainly nothing loose etc in the engine bay as it drove home fine last night and started sh*t after id accidently been through the settings list below.

post-7888-1169126874.jpg

Edited by jazza08
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/152334-power-fc-r34/#findComment-2834126
Share on other sites

Well that solved the engine light. Any other settings that the Power FC has on that i could turn off that may make this problem go away?

I can say driving it that it runs most smooth on R34 Normal. It still mis-fires when you are driving and won't boost very happily at all but on light throttle its OK, the other options seem to make it run abit worse.

Edited by jazza08
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/152334-power-fc-r34/#findComment-2834159
Share on other sites

Well that solved the engine light. Any other settings that the Power FC has on that i could turn off that may make this problem go away?

I can say driving it that it runs most smooth on R34 Normal. It still mis-fires when you are driving and won't boost very happily at all but on light throttle its OK, the other options seem to make it run abit worse.

sweet one down,

is the Air Flow meter the std one or a bigger one?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/152334-power-fc-r34/#findComment-2834161
Share on other sites

Ok... it seems the extreme load points (ign & inj) on the car aren't tuned, ie the values on N19-20 and L19-20 are fairly standard. If i was to put an 80-90% input on the airflow settings maybe this would move the map into the 'tuned' area? I can't get home to test this until 5pm but techincally i would of thought it would of ran ok up until the top end (where these load points are). So maybe thats not the answer...

Even if it was a bigger afm, it should of run OK when i seleted that option? It only seems to make it worse.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/152334-power-fc-r34/#findComment-2835004
Share on other sites

you dont have to use all of the load points, ie: row 19, 20 etc dont have to be used. entering lower % figures will shift the load up the map, ie row 16 would come out as row 13 as an example if using less % correction

this will affect both AFR and IGN timing so be careful and make sure thats really what you want to do (it sounds you dont want to do that)

has it been tuned? is there somethign wrong ?

whats the problem you are trying to solve?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/152334-power-fc-r34/#findComment-2835041
Share on other sites

The car just majorly mis-fires when you try to put load onto it, at idle its fairly ok. Basically it will pop and stutter etc quiet abit, and if u try to come onto light boost it will become 10x worse. So im guessin either the airflow has been messed up or maybe some injector settings (inj map has been tuned).

Basically after driving it i turned it off, went to look at each power fc setting not knowing when you move one it changes it and you loose the last one (idiot as i said before i know). Then when i started the car in the mornin it was stuttering all over the place, ive re-set the power fc and put the ign/inj values back in and its better but still not running properly at all...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/152334-power-fc-r34/#findComment-2835059
Share on other sites

Ive checked the obvious cooler piping etc but can't find anything..

Plus the car was running fine, turned it off, played with power fc and in the morning it was running very rough which indicates it must be the power fc?

I will triple check all the piping and engine etc when i get home i guess

Do the settings in ACCELER do anything?

Edited by jazza08
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/152334-power-fc-r34/#findComment-2835215
Share on other sites

Car was tuned properly and ran very well until i looked at the settings.

Peak knock levels used to be around 16-18 when pushin the car hard, so it was tuned safely aswell.

Previous owner told me its a standard afm just then. Should that then be run on standard r34 or power intake (as it has a pod filter)?

Edited by jazza08
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/152334-power-fc-r34/#findComment-2835377
Share on other sites

speak to your tuner, most of them keep the dat file from your tune on their laptops, he might still have yours and be able to reload all the settings from before you data init. the unit.

if he is nice it wont even cost you, so give him a call.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/152334-power-fc-r34/#findComment-2836556
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...