Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

For most 'normal' people, a three inch does all that it is supposed to (less restriction). Anything bigger is for show or really, really high horse power applications (you do actually need some backpressure to run smoothly/properly for anything remotely like daily driving).

Forced induction cars don't need backpressure anywhere near as much as NA cars. Because the turbo forces more than 1 atmosphere of pressure into the cylinder, it's pretty well "sucked" out by the lower pressure atmosphere behind it.

It's also the main reason why extractors are more suited to NA cars. Not really because NA cars have more to gain from the extractors, but because turbo cars have less to lose from an inefficient exhaust manifold design.

I think 4" dump would be too big for a normal street-driven GTS-t and sap a little performance, but I think the same pipe would absolutely kill the performance of any normal NA car.

You cant have too little back pressure. Think about this, people spend alot of time and money getting the air in and OUT of the head as easily and quickly as possible - head porting, heat wrapping, etc - all designed to get the air out quicker. Back pressure will not help this, it will fight it, it will retain heat in the cylinders. What possible good does it do in the pursuit of hp????

The cat is a BIG restriction to the flow of the exhaust. If you ever get the chance have a look inside one - its scary.

I read a post by Sydneykid where he flow tested a 3" (or was it 2.5" - Sydneykid) pipe, and found no restriction to air flow up to around 600hp air flow (help again Sydneykid!) or more.

Another thing to consider is what mufflers/resonators are fitted to the exhaust. I originally fitted an N1 style exhaust - very loud but made boost very quickly and gave a good power increase.

I then changed to a Nismo exhaust with 1 muffler and 1 resonator and I noticed the car slowed down, and made boost later. Both systems were 3". Sorry I can't back this up with dyno figures.

My personal advice would be to get the biggest diameter, least restrictive exhaust that you can - it cant hurt! Then fit the highest flow cat you can find;) you'll love it.

The design of the exhaust is as tricky as you make it.

The most forgotten dimension by exhaust upgraders is the 'thermal' one (and it relates directly to exhaust gas speed). At the start of the turbo exit the gases have incredible heat (and therefore speed and pressure) ,as the gasses travel back the speed of the gas reduces as its energy is lost to the pipe and radiated as heat.

Here is where it gets hard. The cooler gases are best not put through overly large pipes as it can increase turbulence but, smaller pipes have a larger surface area to volume ratio to lose heat through!

In practice I have found that the largest diameter should be at the start of the turbine outlet, any larger and you create unnecessary turbulence. Factory turbo --- 3inch from memory. Think 'match porting' at this stage.

Next the cat needs to be as close to the turbo as is practical, better still lets forget you have one (they kill power).

The first 3inch muffler needs to be nice and close to the dump pipe and filled with stainless packing (fibreglass will usually die and turn the muffler into a marracca) Exhaust places directing you to fibreglass mufflers will never place a muffler very close to the dump for this reason.

The second muffler before the diff @ 2 1/2 inch and 2 1/4 over the diff into a slight megaphone shaped tail pipe that tappers gradually out to 4inches.

Wrap the dump pipe to the first muffler or cat (which has been ceramic coated) in heat tape. If you have the money coat or wrap the entire exhaust.

If you tell people to reduce exhaust pipe diameter as you go back on a street car exhaust , they look at you funny and think your a loon.No it's not about backpressure, it's about retaining a low pressure 'trail' all the way back to the tail pipe. Hi I'm certified ! :P

I forgot to mention that the design is one that goes from 'hot' to 'cold' front to back and as that relates to high pressure to low pressure your home and hosed.

Then again if you can trap all the heat in then a uniform diameter of 3 inches all the way is the shot.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
×
×
  • Create New...