Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

ok well there is the first problem

if the boost display isnt correct then you have very little hope of controlling it correctly, other than guesstimation. what is the part no# on the map sensor?

it sounds like you may have a different rated map sensor

Paul

I will look tonight, but if i remember i couldnt locate the part number. I'll check. When i initially hooked it up, i had no problems, at least i could control boost so that part doesnt particularly worry me.

It does come with the kit, i got my kit 2nd hand with my PFC and it didnt come with it

Ahhh i thought so, thanks for clearing that up,also does the power fc boost controll solenoid plug straight into the gts25t standard boost controll solenoid wiring loom?

Cheers mate

Ahhh i thought so, thanks for clearing that up,also does the power fc boost controll solenoid plug straight into the gts25t standard boost controll solenoid wiring loom?

Cheers mate

no you have to cut and solder.

maybe back the front?

Tried reversing the NO line, wastegate didnt even open so plumbed it back.

I guess its the solenoid

Hey,

edit: strangeness! if you connected to the other port, you should have had exact reversal of previous

behaviour - with BCK enabled, should have been running on spring pressure; with it disabled, should

have been "unlimited" boost. Anyway...

At least you're making progress :)

Put a multimeter that can measure duty-cycle on the solenoid, and see whether it's being told to open or not.

At this point it doesn't _sound_ like the solenoid to me - when you have it enabled, it's closed; and when you have

it disabled, it's open. Sounds like the solenoid's working fine, but the controller's not telling it to open ... the

meter will tell you for sure though.

Regards,

Saliya

Edited by saliya
Hey,

edit: strangeness! if you connected to the other port, you should have had exact reversal of previous

behaviour - with BCK enabled, should have been running on spring pressure; with it disabled, should

have been "unlimited" boost. Anyway...

At least you're making progress :glare:

Put a multimeter that can measure duty-cycle on the solenoid, and see whether it's being told to open or not.

At this point it doesn't _sound_ like the solenoid to me - when you have it enabled, it's closed; and when you have

it disabled, it's open. Sounds like the solenoid's working fine, but the controller's not telling it to open ... the

meter will tell you for sure though.

Regards,

Saliya

Thats what i am thinking , the controller isnt telling the solenoid to open, coz the solenoid is opening. Also, something i noticed on my controller, Settings, Boost, no.2 the last digits are 201 instead of 255, all the rest are 255. Is this normal??

Cheers

Thats what i am thinking , the controller isnt telling the solenoid to open, coz the solenoid is opening. Also, something i noticed on my controller, Settings, Boost, no.2 the last digits are 201 instead of 255, all the rest are 255. Is this normal??

Cheers

Pretty sure that's the "learning" part; _exactly_ what the number means I don't know; but when you change

the duty cycle it goes to 255 again. A number that's not 255 is perfectly normal as far as I know.

If I had to guess I'd say it's "attack" - and that it self-adjusts so that you approach target boost as fast as

possible without hitting the boost cut - but I don't know :P

Regards,

Saliya

i just dont see how the boost control kit would work if the boost reading youve set to be desired and duty control, but the boost control the PFC is seeing is way off

like if you set the target boost to be 1.2bar at 80 duty cycle thats fine

but if the map sensor signal is wacko and it only ever see's say 0.30bar cos its wrong, then it has little hope of working, or at least i dont see how?

i just dont see how the boost control kit would work if the boost reading youve set to be desired and duty control, but the boost control the PFC is seeing is way off

like if you set the target boost to be 1.2bar at 80 duty cycle thats fine

but if the map sensor signal is wacko and it only ever see's say 0.30bar cos its wrong, then it has little hope of working, or at least i dont see how?

Hey,

if the MAP sensor's reading 0.5kg/cm2 and you set target to 0.5 (and it's _really_ 'something else') don't see how that would

be a problem - after all, it doesn't really care _what_ the number is, only how close to (or far away) you are from it...

I'm pretty sure he's "aiming" at the sensor reading (like if the sensor reads 0.5, but that's really 1, and he really wants 1, then

he programs 0.5...)

The only time this would be a problem that I can see is in terms of resolution (like if 0.1 == 1, then an 0.2 overboost is actually

3 instead of 1.2); or in terms of minimums (say it reads 0.3 @ 1; you can't dial up 0.3 as a target if you want 1)

Regards,

Saliya

Hey,

if the MAP sensor's reading 0.5kg/cm2 and you set target to 0.5 (and it's _really_ 'something else') don't see how that would

be a problem - after all, it doesn't really care _what_ the number is, only how close to (or far away) you are from it...

I'm pretty sure he's "aiming" at the sensor reading (like if the sensor reads 0.5, but that's really 1, and he really wants 1, then

he programs 0.5...)

The only time this would be a problem that I can see is in terms of resolution (like if 0.1 == 1, then an 0.2 overboost is actually

3 instead of 1.2); or in terms of minimums (say it reads 0.3 @ 1; you can't dial up 0.3 as a target if you want 1)

Regards,

Saliya

Saliya

Exactly, previously i was able to set my boost aruond the wrong reading and didnt particularly worry me.

Well ive given up, the solenoid has power there, i cant hear it move, so i am thinking it maybe my PFC which cannot adjust anything to it. Going to get rid of it and try a cheap boost valve.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Bit of a pity we don't have good images of the back/front of the PCB ~ that said, I found a YT vid of a teardown to replace dicky clock switches, and got enough of a glimpse to realize this PCB is the front-end to a connected to what I'll call PCBA, and as such this is all digital on this PCB..ergo, battery voltage probably doesn't make an appearance here ; that is, I'd expect them to do something on PCBA wrt power conditioning for the adjustment/display/switch PCB.... ....given what's transpired..ie; some permutation of 12vdc on a 5vdc with or without correct polarity...would explain why the zener said "no" and exploded. The transistor Q5 (M33) is likely to be a digital switching transistor...that is, package has builtin bias resistors to ensure it saturates as soon as base threshold voltage is reached (minimal rise/fall time)....and wrt the question 'what else could've fried?' ....well, I know there's an MCU on this board (display, I/O at a guess), and you hope they isolated it from this scenario...I got my crayons out, it looks a bit like this...   ...not a lot to see, or rather, everything you'd like to see disappears down a via to the other side...base drive for the transistor comes from somewhere else, what this transistor is switching is somewhere else...but the zener circuit is exclusive to all this ~ it's providing a set voltage (current limited by the 1K3 resistor R19)...and disappears somewhere else down the via I marked V out ; if the errant voltage 'jumped' the diode in the millisecond before it exploded, whatever that V out via feeds may have seen a spike... ....I'll just imagine that Q5 was switched off at the time, thus no damage should've been done....but whatever that zener feeds has to be checked... HTH
    • I think Fitmit had some, have a look on there (theyre Australian as well)
    • Hah, fair enough! But if you learn with this one you can drive any other OEM manual. No modern luxury features like auto rev-matching or hillstart assist to give you a false sense of confidence. And a heavy car with not that much torque so it stalls easily. 
    • Actually, I'd say all three are the automatic option. Just the different trim levels. The manual would be RSFS, no? 
×
×
  • Create New...