Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 73
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

me FTL - *cough BULLSHIT cough*

coz im the king......and adz is the peasant, choo loose AHAHHHAAHAHA

yes ryan, you happen to be right on this one, i really do want to drive and show u up....but your degrading insults are really taking effect on my mental health......hahaha more bullshit, kansai better not smell like sex 2moro after leaving you and adz there by yourselves

parts used were

stagea lower control arms,hubs, rotors and calipers (although these will be swapped for R32 4 psiton etc)

so Stagea front stuff as in much no miss matching of parts

front would be as wide as if you put s14 lower control arms on so what 10-15mm wider on each side or something

the rear we had to use the stagea hubs and rotors on the ceffy rear craddle so its not any wider

ps Adz you owe me a tie rod end yours is gay

post-15018-1171863741.jpg

Edited by 1400r

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. You mean he owes Terry.

Oh and I want those Rims.................

I might come out and keep u company wed ryan. I need to sort out this friggen problem with my engine. Its giving me the shits now.

No one likes the RB missing now

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

HAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHA

why were so many ha's required? lol

you have lots of company time ryan

g1 whenever

nicko whenever

brenton wednesday

me friday

we lub joo!

bringing a good tie rod on friday ryan - we install :P

Edited by Hella Flush
parts used were

stagea lower control arms,hubs, rotors and calipers (although these will be swapped for R32 4 psiton etc)

so Stagea front stuff as in much no miss matching of parts

front would be as wide as if you put s14 lower control arms on so what 10-15mm wider on each side or something

the rear we had to use the stagea hubs and rotors on the ceffy rear craddle so its not any wider

ps Adz you owe me a tie rod end yours is gay

So does that mean that stagea fronts will bolt on? Didn't you say it was the same as r33 ie need s14/15 front hubs? If its straight bolt on then im getting stagea setup!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...