Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Anyone know how to do this or what to buy? I know 4-door headlights are chrome but I can never find any and if I do they're usually in crappy condition.

In the forsale thread there was mention of a chrome insert anyone know where to get these?

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...howtopic=155629

Or another idea I've heard of is painting them or powder coating????

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/155642-chrome-head-lights-for-r33/
Share on other sites

personally im not a fan...but each to there own i guess :P

as you mentioned, easiest way is to find decent second hand 4 door lights. Otherwise you could buy them brand new from a Nissan dealer (which will be a huge expense). Or i guess you could pull your headlights apart and take the plastic part you want chromed to a coating place or panel shop and get it chromed. You can also buy chrome spray paint in a pressure can for plastic from Autobarn/SuperCheap/Repco etc..., also have to use a plastic primer. But dont think that turns you fully chrome? more like an extremely bright silver.

food for thought.

Cheers

if by any chance u know how too get the insert out you can buy both them if you want for 250 the passenger side backing of the light is cracked and stuff and the lense has damage too but the chrome insert is still sweet was just a thought anyways if interested pm me

personally i cant tell the difference, but i haven't looked that closely at 4 door lights cuz there only 1 in town.

What is the difference in lights? all i know is i had to buy a series 2 cuz i didn't like series 1 lights.

SI R33 Sedan headlights are different to SII. The SII lights are the chromed out ones, they only have one bulb for high and low beam H4 i think, plus they have another globe/light, that when you indicate around corners, it throws light out at approx 45 degree angle, awesome feature, once you have it you never want to go back. The only thing is that the lights make the car look older, as the lense is not clear like the coupe lights with the separate high/low globes.

cheers

Evil

If you have a series 1, ill sell you my chrome inserts. Its pretty much as easy as heating your headlights up to break the seal replace the inserts then heating back up clipping together again.

Edited by Silent
But isnt heating the headlights to remove the inserts a risky thing to do?

Can't you damage the headlight assembly by doing that?

Not so much that, but getting it to seal again is the problem to prevent moisture getting in. I've decided not to do it too much effort

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...