Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Collaboration: geno8r & d-d (also known as 'dskyz')

http://geno8r.deviantart.com/gallery/

http://dskyz.deviantart.com/gallery/

Went out for my first night shoot session last night with d-d & his 350D SLR, was a good night to learn a bit about night photography & have noticed some areas where we can improve.

Location & tripod placement by: geno8r & d-d

Photos snapped & 350D settings by: d-d

Photoshop tweaked by: geno8r

Look forward to the next session & pumping out some better shots.

Enjoy :happy:

350Z___R33_GTR_1_by_geno8r.jpg

350Z___R33_GTR_2_by_geno8r.jpg

350Z_Night_1_by_geno8r.jpg

350Z___R33_GTR_Night_1_by_geno8r.jpg

350Z_Night_2_by_geno8r.jpg

R33_GTR_Night_1_by_geno8r.jpg

350Z_Night_3_by_geno8r.jpg

350Z_Night_4_by_geno8r.jpg

350Z_Night_5_by_geno8r.jpg

R33_GTR_Night_2_by_geno8r.jpg

R33_GTR_Night_3_by_geno8r.jpg

350Z_Night_6_by_geno8r.jpg

R33_GTR_Night_4_by_geno8r.jpg

350Z___R33_GTR_1b_by_geno8r.jpg

350Z___R33_GTR_2b_by_geno8r.jpg

:)

Edited by geno8r
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/156383-350z-r33-gtr-night-shoot-session/
Share on other sites

http://ic3.deviantart.com/fs14/f/2007/045/...b_by_geno8r.jpg

thats cool.. real lightning? you have the camera on timer for that one?

looks like its choped though

Yeah added in photoshop, I don't care if photos are real or not, as long as they look good! :happy:

They look excellent!

The lightning one is outstanding, looks like the real thing. :huh:

The 3rd last photo of my car came up brilliantly in PS when i played around with it, that one seems fairly yellow!!

Till the next hawt photo session!

Ciao~~

:huh:

They look excellent!

The lightning one is outstanding, looks like the real thing. :P

The 3rd last photo of my car came up brilliantly in PS when i played around with it, that one seems fairly yellow!!

Till the next hawt photo session!

Ciao~~

Yeah I delib gave that photo green lighting, why... because it looks good! I've had the most comments on it so far on DeviantArt

http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/48756534/

I've also got 2 other versions of it here @ home dave, 1. The original lighting tweaked, 2. ^ the green version, 3. A blue’ish version.

Might post up a few more variations later.

I'm not a photographer so don't take my word to seriously, but it looks like you went over the top with some of the flares on the lights in photoshop..... takes away from the car....

I'm not sure 100% sure what you mean, but if you’re saying I modified the light flares in Photoshop they’re actually un-modified, that’s how the photos came out from the camera / camera settings. On DeviantArt another guy said the same thing thinking that I actually added or enhanced the light flares, all I’ve done is tweaked the levels, hue, colours etc.

My main criticism of the photos is that we didn't get the right angle / amount of light on the cars sometimes (mainly mine due to it being black). But overall they still look pretty good due the location.

Although we were taking shots of the cars, the car isn’t the only focus, it was a good location with nice backgrounds due to the lighting so it was deliberate to include the background (with the cool lighting) in the right perspective into the shot :mad:

Next time will try to get better focus / lighting on the car, & depending on the background lighting, maybe reduce the aperture if there's too much light flaring going on.

first one seems like u used a high ISO, or adjusted the levels TOO much for it to come out noisy like that

The first shot I recently re-posted it with added sharpness. I like the grainy sepia look in that photo, if you look down to the other version (2nd last image) you’ll see its not as sharp & looks a little blurry in my opinion (yes due to too high ISO I think). A similar grainy image I think looks good is http://ic3.deviantart.com/fs14/f/2007/022/...2_by_geno8r.jpg

agree use lowest iso next time! less noise..otherwise some great shots

Yep! Agreed. I believe we were using ISO 800, we wanted nice colourful photos due to the nice lighting / location but it seems it was too high giving us too much nose, def will try 400, 200 next time.

  • 4 weeks later...

Hey,

Lookn good. First pic of the 300 by itself is my favourite.

Last pic with the lightning is aight but the reflection off the side of the car puts it out of place.

I think alot of those photos with the cars by themselves would look better if the wheels weren't turned.

Nice work!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yes I can see how that would put you off HFM, especially with the price of good quality brake fluid. From what I understand it as you say the BM50 is the standard BMC for a R32 GTR, I must admit I would like to go far a Genuine Nissan BM57, but lack of cash prevents that at present. With the price being so close between the genuine BM50 and BM57 a BM57 New it seems a better choice as you gain that 1/16 bore size with the BM57, I would be interested in how much difference you feel with the BM57 fitted. I am going to take SteveL's advice in the short term and see how much actually comes out of that proportioning valve vent and save up for the Genuine Nissan part. Thanks for clarifying the HFM failure
    • Thanks mate. I just got the post inspection 1/2 done from state roads when the starter motor packed up, either that or the car alarm system is having trouble.  OEM part number 23300-AA112.
    • Hi, I though I was coming to an end in finding a replacement starter motor for a rb25de neo. I came across a starter motor from Taarks and a message below stating: Direct fit. 11 Tooth count. All below part numbers have been superseded to 11 teeth. Can some body shed some light on going from 8 teeth to 11 teeth apart from 36-month / 25,000 km warranty for passenger vehicles to 12 Month Warranty. Compatible with the following Nissan part numbers: 23300-20P00 23300-20P01 23300-20P05 23300-20P10 23300-20P11 23300-AA111 23300-AA112 23300-AA300 23300-08U10 23300-08U11 23300-08U15  
    • Low battery? Maybe check capacity? I know first-hand, on BMWs if your battery drops below 80% capacity, it starts causing strange issues.
    • 8.5 +37 = should fit rear, but I think it'll hit on front. What you want is low 30s/high 20's front, mid 30's rear. That 17" screenshot you posted looks good, I'd run it on my R32 (but that's long dead now). For tyre sizes, my rule of thumb is: 8': 235, 9": 255. But that's just my opinion. Nismo sizes: 18x8.5+35/18x9.5+38 is a good starting point.
×
×
  • Create New...