Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys , recently i dynoed my car and after the dyno, i did a engine compression test and the numbers were pretty bad compared to 2 years ago ~ which was around 130 across all 5 cyclinders except for the 2nd cyclinder which is 100. But after adding some oil on the 2nd cyclinder, the compression on the 2nd cyclinder immediately jumped back up to 125 psi. So they concluded that the injector in the 2nd cyclinder is faulty. But after asking few other workshops, they are saying injectors and low compression rates are unrelated..

any ideas guys ?

Thanks

injectors are before the valves. The oil let the loose rings in cyl2 seal better which bumped up the compression, temporarily. If they added oil to the other cylinders they more then likely would have jumped up much the same, so across the board would have been something like 155.

Surely all the oil is doing is sealing the rings better which means that's what's no good in that cylinder. If the test with oil didn't go up then you would be looking at valves. That's my theory anyway.

Surely all the oil is doing is sealing the rings better which means that's what's no good in that cylinder. If the test with oil didn't go up then you would be looking at valves. That's my theory anyway.

thanks for the replies guys, so is it safe to say its unrelated and irregardless if the injector is faulty or not adding oil will bump the compression readings up ?

thanks for the replies guys, so is it safe to say its unrelated and irregardless if the injector is faulty or not adding oil will bump the compression readings up ?

Unrelated with injectors mate .

You are correct abo .

If a little amount of oil increases comp it means rings and or bore worn but don't forget a substantial amount will increase comp because the combustion chamber is smaller because of the oil . In a low comp cyl if puting oil in to it doesn't increase comp it means the valves are leaking.

Do a leakdown test as well.

leakdown test is the best test to do.

Remove the sparkplugs, remove the intake and oil cap do your test. if its intake valves and there is reasonable leakage you'll hear/feel it coming out the intake, same for exhaust if its piston/rings you'll hear/feel it coming out the oil cap. just make sure that each cylinder is firing TDC (top dead centre).

Its a good idea to turn the motor over a few times once spark plugs are removed just incase theres any foreign matter between the valve and the seat which will give a false reading.

leakdown test is the best test to do.

Remove the sparkplugs, remove the intake and oil cap do your test. if its intake valves and there is reasonable leakage you'll hear/feel it coming out the intake, same for exhaust if its piston/rings you'll hear/feel it coming out the oil cap. just make sure that each cylinder is firing TDC (top dead centre).

Its a good idea to turn the motor over a few times once spark plugs are removed just incase theres any foreign matter between the valve and the seat which will give a false reading.

Thanks guys for the replies, im sending my car in for the leakdown test tommorow. Will see how it goes and check out what is the problem

Cheers

Thanks guys for the replies, im sending my car in for the leakdown test tommorow. Will see how it goes and check out what is the problem

Cheers

HEy guys, got my leak down test and compression test done today. results were

Compression test Leak down test

cyc 1 : 155 10%

cyc 2: 155 20%

cyc3 : 155 5%

cyc4: 153 5%

cyc 5 : 150 5%

cyc 6 : 151 5%

looks like all went well and will be proceeding to the next mods :domokun:

Thanks for the feedbacks

HEy guys, got my leak down test and compression test done today. results were

Compression test Leak down test

cyc 1 : 155 10%

cyc 2: 155 20%

cyc3 : 155 5%

cyc4: 153 5%

cyc 5 : 150 5%

cyc 6 : 151 5%

looks like all went well and will be proceeding to the next mods :domokun:

Thanks for the feedbacks

That indicates bore and or ring wear on number 2. and to a lesser extend in number 1 as well .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...