Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Guest SiM97

thanks Instant! was only able to go for drive and not see any dyno charts but it is hell laggy!! by 4 and half i think boost lifted full to 1.3 and it rocketed. dont know what the chances of are holding onto it in the wet?

one other question. is it possible to see what cc the injectors are on a vehicle?

thanks

Originally posted by INASNT

from all the tests i have seen with the 2540 in single and twin form they produce good peak power but u get an crap turbo lap power curve

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/16359-hks-2540/#findComment-336696
Share on other sites

Hi guys, another one with 2540 experience, try a 2530 and you will be amazed at the difference, almost the same max power but much earlier boost, more progression and much higher average power (flatter power curve).

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/16359-hks-2540/#findComment-336744
Share on other sites

Guest Yoda

i've got 2540 on rb25.

yes, 4500, it kicks in.

1st gear, 2nd gear will spin, rain hail or shine (255's on rear).

getting camber adjusted next week for more traction. new computer will reduce lag, i believe. i'm running stock injectors though, so maybe less lag with bigger injectors?

goes really well though :P

i'll try to get it dyno'd while i'm in town and put the sheets up for you guys to look at. i expect it to look like a cliff face...

oh, and i running an f'manage too. definitely more power with it, but not much smoother. need a powerfc or autronics... :D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/16359-hks-2540/#findComment-337640
Share on other sites

Sydney kid,

like KamikazeR33 im also looking at HKS 25series for my RB25. Would you suggest a 2530 would be quicker than a 2540 on the street due to higher avg power? also how bout the 2535? would the 2530 still be a better option? CHEERS!

---> ahh just seen you answered in my Hks Gt2530/2535 thread, thanks, you might wanna check it out kamikazeR33.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/16359-hks-2540/#findComment-338234
Share on other sites

Guest INASNT
Originally posted by Yoda

have just been told i can expect 2540 to come in up to 1500 rpm lower with powerfc. thats about 3000, very acceptable...

for it to come in earlier u will have to get different cams and adj cam gears but then u will sacrifice top end!

i still dont see the 2540 make full boost by 3000rpm.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/16359-hks-2540/#findComment-338558
Share on other sites

Originally posted by PRO_32

how bout the 2530 on an rb20 what kinda output would i be looking at I would'nt mind sacrificing a bit of MAx power for torque as that would probably make it quicker on the street anyway

cheers

Ive been researching the 2530's like crazy coz im getting one soon, sydneykid has been very helpful in providing info!

2530 on an RB20:- 220rwkw at 1.1bar boost.

sydneykid tells me 2530 on RB25 = 230rwkw at 1.1bar.

Not huge numbers by dyno comp standards, but with fat torque from very usable levels, should make a damn quick street car that wont leave you hanging around waiting for the power to kick in.

(there seem to have been quite a few threads on HKS GT series stuff lately!)

So, GT2530 on RB20 or 25 with 220+rwkw should be easy 12's, with better than stock drivability (with well tuned ECU), what more would ya want from a street car!?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/16359-hks-2540/#findComment-339879
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • @Haggerty this is your red flag. In MAP based ECU's the Manifold pressure X RPM calculation is how the engine knows it is actually...running/going through ANY load. You are confusing the term 'base map' with your base VE/Fuel table. When most people say 'base map' they mean the stock entire tune shipped with the ECU, hopefully aimed at a specific car/setup to use as a base for beginning to tune your specific car. Haltech has a lot of documentation (or at least they used to, I expect it to be better now). Read it voraciously.
    • I saw you mention this earlier and it raised a red flag, but I couldn't believe it was real. Yes, the vacuum signal should vary. It is the one and only load signal from the engine to the ECU, and it MUST vary. It is either not connected or is badly f**ked up in some way.
    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
×
×
  • Create New...