Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey, well i'm in need of some quick advice before tomorrow. I need to know some reasonable settings for taking pictures of some drifting at Oran Park tomorrow.

I've been taking photos for a while, and am not shit at it, just don't use custom settings for aperture and exposure etc.

I have a tripod and will be using it.

So, my basic question is how can I setup my camera (Nikon D50) to take some pretty reasonable action pictures of motorsport.

For Example: (Hope you don't mind Mike :)) 74885482.QoaLQfqI.jpg

Thanks a heap, Brent :sorcerer:

Edited by Brent
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/163675-need-some-advice/
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I'm no expert...and I realise this is a bit late but I thought I'd reply just as an FYI...

For these photos you would need to pan the camera to keep the car in the frame, ie. kind of follow the car with the camera for a bit. The camera would need to be set either on a manual focus or some cameras allow you to have it continually focussing even when the shutter button isn't pressed - or you may be able to have it continually focussing while the shutter button is half-pressed, as you wait for the right moment.

The continual focus or manual focus will reduce your "shutter lag" time and allow you to capture the moment without having to wait (sometimes up to a second) for the camera to focus. Then just click the button when you want the shot and its important to note that you should continue with the follow through. When you press the shutter button, try not to bump the camera up/down as you do it, and keep the panning motion of the camera very fluid/smooth. A tripod is probably essential to do this properly...and a very fast shutter speed.

Many cameras have a sport mode that should help out here but I've not used that mode much on mine so I cant really comment - I just know that that's what its for.

For any other action/motion shots, I think the most important thing is a camera with a very fast auto-focus (I love Ricoh digicams for this reason - but they only do "prosumer" cameras, no digital slr's unfortunately). Having subjects in focus will be the goal of your shots, and if you're good you could even frame your subject well (ie. not always centered) while you are following them with the camera :/

Hope that helps ;)

don't bother with the tripod. use ur arms and set ur camera focus onto something like "AI SERVO" (Canon's name for it). for canon users, it means that your cam will continually refocus with the trigger half depressed.

i don't think manual focus would be a good idea for action shots. leave it to the camera to do the focus as it'll always be faster and more accurate than a human in times like that.

main thing is to pan and get ur af points right.

don't bother with the tripod. use ur arms and set ur camera focus onto something like "AI SERVO" (Canon's name for it). for canon users, it means that your cam will continually refocus with the trigger half depressed.

i don't think manual focus would be a good idea for action shots. leave it to the camera to do the focus as it'll always be faster and more accurate than a human in times like that.

main thing is to pan and get ur af points right.

Manual focus could work if the moving subjects are always a similar distance from the camera and the lighting isn't changing much - thats the only reason I suggested that. :thumbsup:

For anyone looking at a camera with pretty much instantaneous Auto Focus, try Ricoh's R4, R5, (and now the new R6) cameras. less than 0.1 seconds to take a photo INCLUDING auto focus. The claimed times are like 0.05 seconds or something, so needless to say the AF is extremely fast. And the photos I find are pretty good for a camera in this class. :P

  • 2 weeks later...

Put your camera on shutter mode and keep the shutter speed low. Set the camera to continual auto focus. Also handy to keep the camera on multiple burst shot mode. Use a monopod if you've got one, if not just practice freehand and get use to the idea of panning and tracking the subject.

Not every photo will be a keeper, you'll have plenty of blurred out shots so make sure you've got plenty of momory and try to shoot in jpeg mode so you can get more shots in as RAW files will msx out the camera buffer memory quick.

The shutter speed has to be low to get that blurred out background effect. A fast shutter speed will make the car look like it's standing still. Last Friday I was shooting my mates car at Wakefield and I was using speeds between 1/60 to 1/100 and the blurred out background turned out pretty well compared to my older pics (I used 1/200-300). I'll post up some pics tomorrow as an example.

here is one of my action shots >_<

qld_078.jpg

Camera Make: Canon

Camera Model: Canon EOS 400D DIGITAL

Image Date: 2007:04:08 17:39:51

Flash Used: No

Focal Length: 170.0mm

CCD Width: 5.87mm

Exposure Time: 0.0010 s (1/1000)

Aperture: f/5.0

ISO equiv: 100

White Balance: Auto

Metering Mode: Matrix

Exposure: Portrait Mode

  • 2 weeks later...

Keep your position varied, try not get stuck in one spot too long.

Try some panning shots; you'll need to drop your shutter speed to atleast 1/200th of a second and then work your way towards 1/60th - depending on the focal length.

Pick a single spot on the car to track and follow, I usually pick a headlight or a door handle; this will help you get sharp shots.

Frame carefully; a good shot will be ruined if half the car is langing out of the frame.

Experiment, practise, experiment and practise some more.

408303252_890273603c.jpg

  • 4 weeks later...
Keep your position varied, try not get stuck in one spot too long.

Try some panning shots; you'll need to drop your shutter speed to atleast 1/200th of a second and then work your way towards 1/60th - depending on the focal length.

Pick a single spot on the car to track and follow, I usually pick a headlight or a door handle; this will help you get sharp shots.

Frame carefully; a good shot will be ruined if half the car is langing out of the frame.

Experiment, practise, experiment and practise some more.

408303252_890273603c.jpg

was this taken on the 24th or 25th ? - i know its near flag point 4 at barbagallo, nice shot

just guessing but, 80mm, 1/80th sec ? (there isnt any exif attached)

oh and taking shots of drifting, try 'S" mode on your nikon, continuous AF and a shutter speed of around 1/160th of a second, keep your ISO as low as you can (100 for full sun, 400 for really overcast) and you shouldnt have any problems

if you have a monopod, use it and try and fill the frame with the car, i normally use a 70-200mm lens for shooting drift

as others have said, pick a single spot on the car and try to keep an AF point marker on it (it get easier with practice)

oh, and the more you shoot the better you will get, i have progressed from really crap to fairly good by attending every race meet i can and practicing

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...