Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

ok i have searched far and wide and i cannot get anything!!!! 4 different forums and many traders haha.... apparently they make no more for rb20! soooo what can i use as a replacement?? please help and i dont wanna remap my comp everytime i modify!

cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/163810-pfc/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 48
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I'm still a big PFC fan... The knock dash light flash is awesome, confidence inspiring especially as dyno's have a nasty habit of not placing enough load on the motor during tuning, once u get it on the street and load it up in that 4th gear from low rpm it pings its arse off. :w00t:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/163810-pfc/#findComment-3037681
Share on other sites

A lot of tuners have a bad taste in their mouth when they hear the word Greedy Emanage.

As a result some will steer you away from it.

As with everything.. Some tuners deal microtech, some autronic, some microtech + powerfc. Use the ecu your tuner feels the most comfortable with as you WILL receive the best tune doing so.

Paul.. 440 is for a full tune.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/163810-pfc/#findComment-3040951
Share on other sites

i dont get it, why the bad taste. is it because no ones had experience with it or bothered using it?

Cubes can you provide a few good reasons why Greddy Emanage isnt used apart from tuners being lazy?

Thanks.

A bad taste is where in the products history it has performed Poorly. Hence the bad taste left over from the older greedy emanage version.

Apparently the Emanage Ultimate is better. But the damage has been done. Its left a bad taste.

Absolutely nothing to do with slackness.

URAS has good results with them. Get him to tune it.

Go to some one who doesn't know its in's and outs and you are likely to not get a nice tune without spending big $$ for dyno time and fiddling around. Quite obvious really.

Now that the PFC is out of the picture it may very well take off, the tuners will be forced to spend some time on the greedy as they become more common.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/163810-pfc/#findComment-3042238
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...