Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ladies and Gents,

Straight out, im selling my car because im at uni, 4 days a week, and i work 2 days on top. And the other day i play rep soccer. In summary i got no time for it.

I love the car, goes very well. paint is great condition but it does have the little door dings. Its original so what car wouldnt have those dings. The motor is mechanically sound as the previous owner had the motor rebuilt along with forged pistons and rods, im unsure of whether the head is std. I did a compression test and my results have been posted sumwhere on this site....they were 146, 146, 147, 146,145,146 so to me and my mechanic mates, and thos guys off the forum, thats a great result. IT was tuned 3 months ago by C&V performance in Sydney and it got 209kw atw on 15 or 16psi. the turbo is a GCG highflow.

im not posting all details on here, my car is on carsales and here is the link

http://www.carsales.com.au/used-cars/priva...20South%20Wales

LOL...just copy the whole thing above as the url.

Im sad to see it for sale, but as i said i cant afford to keep a car in my position that i hardly drive.

Im asking 14,500 ONO as is, but i got a set original M-spec side skirts and rear pods that are not on the car aswell to throw in. I bought the car for alot more but as you all know...when do you win with cars...

if ur serious either PM or call me or msg me on 0405275941

NOTE: if i miss ur call its cause im at uni, so please msg me after ur call and let me know who you are and i will call you back asap

cheers,

Daniel

*if you want more pics PM me ur email address, i got like 50 photos. LOL

IM KEEN TO SELL IF YOUR KEEN TO BUY!!!

Edited by RB20JT
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/166065-please-ignore/
Share on other sites

Price DROP 14,000 ONO

plus:

*2 tyres with 70% tread on them to fit the rims

*BOV

*spare actuator for the turbo

*M-spec side skirts

*cluster surround and middle surround (around stereo and air con and gear stick) painted in red

COME ON GUYS!!!!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/166065-please-ignore/#findComment-3078052
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...