Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

ok ... im sorry if this is covered .. but i couldnt find anything...

Now im looking to buy a R32 turbo ... however it will be a automatic since i am not the only person driving it ....

now my question is since an automatic gearbox is 90% of the time constantly slipping slightly (except in overdrive when they lock) will the slipping cause major damage if the driver tromps down on some serious accelerator?

will there be too much power for the gearbox? also i have heard of a "shift kit" and this is meant to be legal to drive with an auto liscence? and how do they work?

Sorry if thats a dumb question :(

Any information would be appreciated thankyou

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/166155-automatics-and-turbos/
Share on other sites

Yeah, more then likely the clutches will slip when you stand on the go peddle. The whole torque converter and clutches can be replaced. Its like servicing a gearbox basicly.

Shift kits, Now there are several ways to shift kit an auto.

One is where they tighten the bands in the G-Box, making it shift harder. Still an auto, but shifts way harder. You could chirp second easy as pie.

Another one, which I'm not to farmilier with, so forgive my ignorance. Is to make it like a clutchless manual. No clutch, but you need to change the gears (1,2,3,D) if you pull up to the lights in D, when you try to take off its gonna stay in D. Not recomended if multiple are going to be using it. An example is, what most drag cars use. Centrivigul clutch I think they call it.

Third is for the bogans who think its shift kitting. That is to buy the pro ratchet shift. So instead of going down 6 places to first, You'd have to go back and forth 6 places to first. If you know what I mean.

Personaly, I would tighten the bands. Ive seen some Auto's that shift harder then a manual ever can.. and thats scary.

A friend of mine a few years ago paid about $400 I *Think* but he had the gearbox out himself. Will probably be more if they have to take it out themselfs.

Thats another way to do it Bubba. Tightening the bands certainly doesnt make it stronger. My mates box that had his done, lasted a week. But its becuase of a few other things that caused the death of it... aswell as belting it to chirp second -every- time lol.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Version 1 aluminium airbox is.......not acceptable No pics as I "didn't like the look.....alot" Even after all my "CAD", and measurements, the leg near the fusebox just didn't sit right as it ended up about 10mm long and made the angle of the dangle look wrong, the height was a little short as well, meh, I wasn't that confident that Version 1 was going to be an instant winner I might give Version 2 another go, there's plenty of aluminium at work, but, after having in on and off a few times, and laying in the old OEM airbox without the new pod filter and MAF, there may be an option to modify the OEM air box and still use the Autoexe front cover and filter.... maybe This >  Needs to fit in here, but using the panel, and not the pod, the MAF will need to fit in the airbox though> I'm thinking as the old OEM box and Autoexe cover that is sitting in the shed is just sitting around doing nothing, and they are relatively abundant and cheap to replace if I mess it up and need another, it may well fit with some modifications to how the Autoexe brackets mounts to the rad support, and some dremiling to move it get in there, should give me some more room for activities, as I don't want to move the MAF and affect the tune Sealing the hole it requires to stick it in the air box is simple, a tight fit and some pinch weld will seal it up tight  I am calling this a later problem though
    • and it ends up being already priced in as though you're just on 91RON without any ethanol. Car will lose a bit of economy as the short and long term fuel trims bring down the AFR back to stoich or whatever it is for cruise/idle for the engine.  
    • Oh, you are right. But, in Australia E10 is based on 91RON fuel and ends up being 94RON. Hence it being the cheaper option for economy cars. The more performance oriented cars go for the 98RON fuel that has no ethanol mixed in. The only step up we have left then at some petrol stations is E85.
    • There is a warning that "this thread is super old" but they ignore that anyway...
    • With 10% Ethanol, we're talking 2-3% fuel consumption difference. The emissions reductions and octane boost in my opinion far outweigh this almost non existent loss.    My tanks sitting at 80%. Luckily that should go down fast as I'm on vacation again for the next two weeks. 
×
×
  • Create New...