Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

ok this is just for curiosity sake as EMS is going in very soon but how is it possible for the ignition timing to be out after swapping RB20's over???

the reason i believe the timing is out is that it pings above 1.1bar and on the dyno its afr is just above 10 when the ping starts so there is plenty of fuel.

but by experimenting just for the hell of it i turned the CAS clockwise about 4mm and it will now take 1.3bar but producing less power...understandably

now the remapped ECU is the same and the timing was spot on on both RB20's (until i messed with the CAS on the new one)

i thought the ecu controls the timing or is there some other funky business going on that i dont know about..........??

is there any other sensors or factory adjustments or connectors involved in controlling the ignition timing that could be out of sync?

if a cam gear was one tooth out would it give me much more grief then ping at high boost? im assuming major idle problems.

just doesnt make sense..

previous engine ran very nice above 1.3bar with a bucket load more power.

The ECU can only control the timing if it knows where the pistons are in the combustion cycle. Guess what the CAS does?

yes but if the cas is in the correct position as per manufacturers spec on both engines then why would there be pinging on the newly installed engine at lower boost levels with a rich tune (a/f ratio's proven on dyno)

am thinking an issue in the inlet manifold area.... ?!?

everything on the inlet side bar the inlet manifold and throttle body was swapped over from the previous motor.

got me stumped.

any ideas?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Version 1 aluminium airbox is.......not acceptable No pics as I "didn't like the look.....alot" Even after all my "CAD", and measurements, the leg near the fusebox just didn't sit right as it ended up about 10mm long and made the angle of the dangle look wrong, the height was a little short as well, meh, I wasn't that confident that Version 1 was going to be an instant winner I might give Version 2 another go, there's plenty of aluminium at work, but, after having in on and off a few times, and laying in the old OEM airbox without the new pod filter and MAF, there may be an option to modify the OEM air box and still use the Autoexe front cover and filter.... maybe This >  Needs to fit in here, but using the panel, and not the pod, the MAF will need to fit in the airbox though> I'm thinking as the old OEM box and Autoexe cover that is sitting in the shed is just sitting around doing nothing, and they are relatively abundant and cheap to replace if I mess it up and need another, it may well fit with some modifications to how the Autoexe brackets mounts to the rad support, and some dremiling to move it get in there, should give me some more room for activities, as I don't want to move the MAF and affect the tune Sealing the hole it requires to stick it in the air box is simple, a tight fit and some pinch weld will seal it up tight  I am calling this a later problem though
    • and it ends up being already priced in as though you're just on 91RON without any ethanol. Car will lose a bit of economy as the short and long term fuel trims bring down the AFR back to stoich or whatever it is for cruise/idle for the engine.  
    • Oh, you are right. But, in Australia E10 is based on 91RON fuel and ends up being 94RON. Hence it being the cheaper option for economy cars. The more performance oriented cars go for the 98RON fuel that has no ethanol mixed in. The only step up we have left then at some petrol stations is E85.
    • There is a warning that "this thread is super old" but they ignore that anyway...
    • With 10% Ethanol, we're talking 2-3% fuel consumption difference. The emissions reductions and octane boost in my opinion far outweigh this almost non existent loss.    My tanks sitting at 80%. Luckily that should go down fast as I'm on vacation again for the next two weeks. 
×
×
  • Create New...