Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

ok i am looking at getting a safc! will these be good to help tune my car? i have herd there a good little device to sorta substitue the pfc!?

also anyone know how to swap a rb20t with a rb25t on a rb20det? as i have one to do!??

and how long does everyone warm there cars up for?

cheers adrian

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/170469-looking-for-some-ideas/
Share on other sites

I've got a SAFC II on my car, they're perfect if your running a little bit extra boost and dont plan on making big power. Before I got mine I was running 12psi with a really rich tune making 155rwkw, after SAFC got 170rwkw just by leaning it out also saved on fuel big time.

As for changing turbos they both use the same oil lines so its a straight swap may need to modify the dump pipe tho

And for warming up my car I let it run for about 30 sec then drive without going on boost until the temp gauge is up

hope that helps

ok i am looking at getting a safc! will these be good to help tune my car? i have herd there a good little device to sorta substitue the pfc!?

also anyone know how to swap a rb20t with a rb25t on a rb20det? as i have one to do!??

and how long does everyone warm there cars up for?

cheers adrian

This was answered before...u need to work out your future plans for mods on the car. SAfc is a piggy back and will only let u adjust so much.

If u want more power later, u will have to sell it and buy a pfc then. Its not a substitute at all.

Tirbo should be straight swap.

Warm up the car as Tuffr32 said.

R32 remap can be done by Jeff from The Speed Lab. ns.com users all rave about him, have no personal experience. He also did a big thread on there about it in the Forced Performance section. Give him a try, often can work out cheaper and better than an SAFC on the 32's I believe.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah i found that alot of parts can be wrong or "very" hard to get the real right one. I already bought some brakes years ago on me "old" GT calipers and they were wrong too 😄  I told them too. Even send them pictures...but they said "EBC catalogue has them on my car... So i dont know what their answer will be. I call monday them and let them know that they are really not on my car. If they were they would be already on a car...
    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
×
×
  • Create New...