Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

thanks CHris

Hey - how about compressor side. Is the compressor housing on the Rb20 the same beisdes the Pressure T coming off it?

I.e. could you use an rb20 compressor housing on an rb25 and not change the turbo characteristics?

thanks

i can't say i know first hand. but considering a lot of people upgrade to a rb25 turbo on their rb20's....i'd say the difference is the compressor housing because they upgrade for the larger flow. also i know for a fact that the compressor outlet attaches to a different size elbow for the two turbos. My thoughts -----> u'd b limiting the flow back down to an rb20 turbo standard basically.....tho not sure of this...someone back me up hahaha (if i'm right).

thanks CHris

Hey - how about compressor side. Is the compressor housing on the Rb20 the same beisdes the Pressure T coming off it?

I.e. could you use an rb20 compressor housing on an rb25 and not change the turbo characteristics?

thanks

sorry about the delay. Just finished exams today. Rb25 turbo comp housing is 45v, rb20 is 16v.

Nah, they're different. It changes teh characteristics. If you're having surging issues, perhaps you need a bigger a/r exhaust housing like the nissan op6 housing.

They're really rare though - my turbo is an op6 turbo.

The RB20 and VG30 compressor wheels are identical.

The cores are identical; that being the compressor wheel, center section and turbine wheel.

The Rb20 runs a small turbine and compressor cover to keep response up and spool down.

The VG30 turbo runs the larger OP6 turbine housing and larger 45v compressor cover.

The R33 Rb25 turbo runs a turbine housing that is apparently a little larger than the rb20's; be buggered if I was able to pick a difference apart from the markings. The RB25's compressor wheel is noticably larger and runs the larger 45v comp cover.

The R34 RB25 turbo is from what I've seen is the same as the R33 S2 turbo apart from that larger VG30 sized OP6 turbine housing.

The local turbo bloke here in Adelaide (ATS) told me the R32 and R33 turbine housings are a .6 and the VG30 and R34 OP6 turbine housings are a .7. There's nothing on paper stating their size but thats what he 'guestimates' without cutting one up.

In short the turbine housings are all interchangable. The Compressor housings are not; RB20 and VG30 compressor housings you are able to swap over

As for swapping comp covers on the R33/R34 RB25's, why one would want to do that is beyond me as they are the same size. :blink:

  • 5 weeks later...

Bit confused here matey

So is this 04u one the one on your car? or have you sourced another GCG highflow?

If the one on your car has the 04u housing, that could explain the compressor surge issue - too small exhaust housing.

Its hard to tell from the pictures, but does that turbo you posted pics of have a leaking oil seal?

Nah mate the one on my car is the 21U - you are right I have sourced another one. Apparently the oil seal is ok but it does look like oil is coming out the back. . I just posted another question regarding turbo balancing - I'm planning to use the smaller comp wheel on this one on my current one with the 21U housing.

It would have been better if I could have used this one since it is already machined.

Is there really any difference between the rb20 and rb25 housings?

I mean GCG use the Rb20/Rb25 housings interchangeably dont they?

Ah ok, makes sense now.

Well, I can tell for sure that the rb20 comp housing is smaller. It is smaller inside too - evident by the fact that people need to get an rb25 elbow.

In regards to the rb25/20 exhaust housing, the housing is supposedly larger. I didn't measure the 20 housing when I had one, but my friend did, and he said it is larger.

It could be an internal area difference (e.g. like inside the rb20 comp housing - smaller than the 25 comp housing). They might appear to be similar outside, but inside it might be different.

There definitely would be a difference, otherwise nissan wouldn't have used a different number housing

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
    • Probably not. A workshop grade scantool is my go to for proper Consult interrogation. Any workshop grade tool should do it. Just go to a workshop.
×
×
  • Create New...