Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Here are some pictures from my weekend (24/07/07).

This time i headed out with Keita to f*kushima again but not to Ebisu, rather another similar style course called S.S. Park. SS Park is smaller than Ebisu circuit but still boasts 3 seperate circuits (including a gravel course and soon to be built R.C. Course). It is smaller albeit maybe a little more professional than Ebisu. Though they really can't be compared, both have goo and points. Again with my partner in crime Keita, we went out to have a look and Keita entered the Competition held on the day. He didn't win, but he did do better than the poor guy in the Silvia... I was also pleased to see so many people with their children their enjoying the day and having fun. Very different from what i've seen back in Aus. Finally i wanna say a big thanks to Keita again and best of luck at Nikko!

Please enjoy,

Peter

Beautiful S15, which went on to totally destroy its front end only a few laps later...

SSpark%20093.jpg

Sexy S13!!

SSpark%20133.jpg

Nice is the best i can come up with..

SSpark%20332.jpg

This one too... (nice!)

SSpark%20341.jpg

A 4 door going for it

SSpark%20135.jpg

This is what happens when you play with your fuel filler/tank area yourself...

SSpark%20201.jpg

S14 Powah!!

SSpark%20252.jpg

For the 4 door boys..

SSpark%20297.jpg

Locked...

SSpark%20304.jpg

These days really bring the families too...

SSpark%20322.jpg

Edited by Poida

hahah, no Delica space saver action this time hehe, but yeah. I'll get round to upping more videos from all events one day.. One day... .. .. .. ...

awesome pics! bad luck on the s13 bursting into flames...what happened?

S13 i think played with the fuel tank or pump or something. It wasn't clear, but he did something at home and mustn't have done it right and it went up in smoke. Was quite sad to see..

The after result =

post-12196-1184065349_thumb.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...