Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Well I must say I saw the most pathetic thing today.

I was cruising down Beach Rd and came up behind a Silver R33 GTSt Spec 2, had nice mags, BOV, lowered etc... and then I noticed on the back of it...

It had a bloody GTR badge on it, I mean what the!!!, what sort of person puts a GTR badge on the rear of their GTSt??.... Only a person in the know is going to know what the difference between a GTR and a GTS is anyway, and because of that they will know its a fake.

And to make it funnier and even more stupid, the car didn't even have a GTR body kit on it.

Hmm well if you are reading this then please take that badge off.. Its just like rice boys putting EVO kits on a standard lancer... losers.

My 2c.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/1769-fake-gtrs/
Share on other sites

:lol: :lol: :lol:

I know a certain person on here that has a GTR badge on his GTST and he only has a GTR front bar.This car would probably beat a few GTR`s though.I think he said it gives him an extra 10kw of rice power about the same as his Trust sticker on his timing cover and also his NISMO fuel only sticker.You see it all adds up and thats why he has a very fast GTST :lol: :lol: :lol:

I wonder where he is anyway,havnt caught up with him for a while.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/1769-fake-gtrs/#findComment-33344
Share on other sites

Gees,we could really go to town on him at the moment since it doesnt look like he is getting on here.

Hmmm,i know he has a new ricey rego plate to.I think he was quoted as saying"this will give me 20rwkw of rice).That would have to be the biggest mod done to the car so far :burnout: :shake: :lol: :lol:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/1769-fake-gtrs/#findComment-33916
Share on other sites

WATZZZZZUP Homies :wassup: ,

I've just had my car run on the Rice'o'matic Rice Power dyno (long grain version) & she pumped out 550rkw (rkw = rice killa' watz) These new rego plates are wicked man! 50rkw gain! :shake: :cool:

But seriously.... The car's actually in @ RPM sussing out a few minor hassles & getting some further tuning work this week. Hopefully it'll be ready for Friday? :confused:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/1769-fake-gtrs/#findComment-34205
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Input shaft bearing. They all do it. There is always rollover noise in Nissan boxes - particularly the big box. Don't worry about it unless it gets really growly.
    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
×
×
  • Create New...