Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

If you put a different hose running from your intercooler pipe to the actuator you are running more boost because there is less pressure going to the actuator so the wastegate doesn't open and keeps building boost. The standard vac line that runs to the actuator has a restrictor in it that reduces the diameter inside the hose. A smaller diameter means higher pressure - higher pressure means wastegate opens earlier creating less boost. Imagine it like having a pea shooter - with the thin pipe it will shoot quite far due to the greater pressure but if you had a large diameter pipe with a pea in it it wouldn't go very far. - hope that makes sense :)

That coupled with your new exhaust.

Dude that sounds so wrong.

the smaller pipe will not give you a higher pressure. are you saying that the air pressure in my intercooler piping could be say, 10psi, and because my piping to the actuator is smaller, the pressure inside here will be around 15psi? It doesnt work like that. use common sense.

In actual fact, because an actuator has little air flow to it, the restrictor wont do alot other then slow movement and proberbly make boosting smoother on the standard setup.

Where is everyone taking there actuator tap from? my problem has been fixed, i moved it to the piping immediatly after the turbo and fitted new BIGGER hose straight to the actuator.

Dude that sounds so wrong.

the smaller pipe will not give you a higher pressure. are you saying that the air pressure in my intercooler piping could be say, 10psi, and because my piping to the actuator is smaller, the pressure inside here will be around 15psi? It doesnt work like that. use common sense.

In actual fact, because an actuator has little air flow to it, the restrictor wont do alot other then slow movement and proberbly make boosting smoother on the standard setup.

Where is everyone taking there actuator tap from? my problem has been fixed, i moved it to the piping immediatly after the turbo and fitted new BIGGER hose straight to the actuator.

It doesn't sound wrong at all Dude.... It is common sense. Reducing the diametre of a hose increases the pressure inside the hose. Hence why do you think taking the restrictor out of a gtr or an s15 for example ups the boost when replaced with a generic piece of fuel line or silicon hose... Because the pressure to the actuator is reduced hence the turbo creates more boost as the wastgate doesn't open as early or as much.

Cheers 'dude'

Btw 'slowing airflow to the actuator :huh: ' is not going to make boost come on 'smoother' If anything it would ramp up faster and harder because the wastegate is not opening as much.

Which is why that is Not what it is doing in the stock setup.

Edited by R33silverS2
It doesn't sound wrong at all Dude.... It is common sense. Reducing the diametre of a hose increases the pressure inside the hose. Hence why do you think taking the restrictor out of a gtr or an s15 for example ups the boost when replaced with a generic piece of fuel line or silicon hose... Because the pressure to the actuator is reduced hence the turbo creates more boost as the wastgate doesn't open as early or as much.

Cheers 'dude'

Your analogy is completely wrong. As i said before.

You seem to not understand the relationship between pressure and flow. are you saying if i block off a pipe, and plug the other end into a compresser, that as the pipe gets smaller and smaller it will have higher pressure until it reachs the end? You cannot deny the fact that when flow ceases pressure will equalise on both sides of a restriction. For this reason, I don't see how having a smaller pipe will give you less boost.

can anyone else clarify? perhaps with some more in depth arguements?

LMAO

Because the pipe going to my boost gauge is really small, MAYBE, just MAYBE i am reading a much higher boost then i am actually running.

DEAR GOD

the problem is solved, maybe we have different boost gauge piping!

what size is the pipe running to your boost gauge R33silverS2? :huh:

Your boost gauge is calibrated to run off a certain diameter hose. Go plug in a bigger one than it came with and see how you go....

Also please give us your expert analysis on why boost increases when the restrictor hose is removed... >_<

Also enlighten us to what the brass restrictor is for...

Edited by R33silverS2
LMAO

Because the pipe going to my boost gauge is really small, MAYBE, just MAYBE i am reading a much higher boost then i am actually running.

DEAR GOD

the problem is solved, maybe we have different boost gauge piping!

what size is the pipe running to your boost gauge R33silverS2? >_<

>_<

  • 3 weeks later...
Your boost gauge is calibrated to run off a certain diameter hose. Go plug in a bigger one than it came with and see how you go....

Also please give us your expert analysis on why boost increases when the restrictor hose is removed... :laugh:

Also enlighten us to what the brass restrictor is for...

heres what I've figured so far.

Ive been talking to some pneumatic gurus at work and you are WRONG. smaller diameter in the pipe does NOT mean there is greater pressure. in actual fact, the pressure remains very much the same. Flow only increases. Because of this, and we all know the restrictor lowers boost, the guys believe that the restrictor is in place to keep the gate open longer, after pressure is removed from the actuator side. This means that the wastegate, once fully opened, takes a while to close again, meaning that the boost pressure is kept lower. There is NO such thing as a restrictor to increase pressure, it simply holds pressure at the diaphram for longer. (unlike what R33silverS2 has stated several times, pressure does not increase as the pipe gets smaller)

I fitted a restrictor to my car last week (went and bout 2 inchs of copper tube that fitted my vaccum hose) and my boost has dropped to around 8 pound consistently. The restrictor does work. Obviously, the most efficient way to control boost is electronically. Because of the restrictor, the wastegate also takes longer to open and this means it would be easier to have 'boost spiking' present.

Hope this clears a few things up.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...