Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Can anyone tell me if you need to use replacement flywheel bolts when installing the above clutch on a lightened flywheel.

Can anyone say if the clutch plates in the pic are the correct ones for the clutch they are shown on. Clutch is for my R33

http://members.optushome.com.au/jay51/Nism...late/Nismo2.JPG

http://members.optushome.com.au/jay51/Nism...late/Nismo3.JPG

http://members.optushome.com.au/jay51/Nism...late/Nismo7.JPG

Sydneykid The clutch assembly is Nismo could'

n't see any id on the flywheel but they came together. F'wheel is 6Kg. People who trued it up said it was the hardest metal they had encountered. It's the disparity in the outer and inner diameters of the Xedy plate and the pressure plate that bother me.

butthead: There's no problem bolting on the flywheel problem is the clutch plate fouls the heads of the flywheel bolts. I wondered if you'r supposed to use special bolts with shallower heads to provide cleareace

nismo clutches are made by exedy.

the bolts you need are nismo part no. 12315-42L11 (assuming your clutch assembly is the g-max spec2 for rb25det)

most nissan dealers should be able to order them in for you, or if you're extremely lucky, cross reference them to an exedy part no. that you can pickup locally.

ph1....Thanks, it is the G-max,i'll start chasing the bolts.

Do you by any chance have a part no for the clutch plates, are they identical or is one of them a solid plate.

Anyway thanks for the help

Those clutch plates look too small for the pressure plates. The friction material shouldnt hang over like that? (on the inside) at least on the only nismo twin plate I have seen it didnt - it had new clutch plates in it and both they and the old plates mated up with the pressure plates, and had nismo on them.

To fit OS twin plates you have to cut part of the (stock) bolts off (shorten them) so that they fit - is this the problem you are having?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Haggerty this is your red flag. In MAP based ECU's the Manifold pressure X RPM calculation is how the engine knows it is actually...running/going through ANY load. You are confusing the term 'base map' with your base VE/Fuel table. When most people say 'base map' they mean the stock entire tune shipped with the ECU, hopefully aimed at a specific car/setup to use as a base for beginning to tune your specific car. Haltech has a lot of documentation (or at least they used to, I expect it to be better now). Read it voraciously.
    • I saw you mention this earlier and it raised a red flag, but I couldn't believe it was real. Yes, the vacuum signal should vary. It is the one and only load signal from the engine to the ECU, and it MUST vary. It is either not connected or is badly f**ked up in some way.
    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
×
×
  • Create New...