Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I know we have a cheap boost controller thread already (http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=73375), but I've seen this one in the latest Auto 1 catalogue and haven't been able to find any threads that discuss it here. So here we go.

I know the old adage "you get what you pay for" but I'm just wondering if anyone has tried it out and what they think.

Basically, I'm not going to be in the market for an EBC until I've done the full exhaust, FMIC and HiFlow and thought this might provide a little fun in the mean time. Would any of you do this to your car?

Here's the details:

Monza MSPEC Boost Controller

Dual adjuster in cabin or under bonnet

I will post up a pic a bit later on.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/181403-monza-mspec-boost-controller/
Share on other sites

considering kmart used to sell monza products, i can't imagine it would be of high quality

however a bleed valve is a simple piece of equipment. i imagine it would do the typical job that one would expect it to do. give it a try, for $40 it would have to be one of the cheapest branded bleed valves (not including that turbotech..)

Idon't see why anyone should have to pay $40 for a simple bleeding orifice.

you can make one yourself with a $3 brass t piece from the auto store, drill the hole out to the size you want and use that to adjust boost.

In the past, i've also used plastic irigation taps from bunnings for $2.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Pay careful attention to the kinematics of that upper arm. The bloody things don't work properly even on a normal stock height R32. Nissan really screwed the pooch on that one. The fixes have included changing the hole locations on the bracket to change the angle of the inner pivot (which was fairly successful but usually makes it impossible to install or remove the arm without unbolting the bracket from the tower, which sucks) and various swivelling upper arm designs. ALL the swivelling upper arm designs that look like a capital I (with serifs) suck. All of them. Some of them are in fact terribly unsafe. Even the best one of them (the old UAS design) shat itself in short order on my car. The only upper arm that works as advertised and is pretty safe is the GKTech one. But it is high maintenance on a street car. I'm guessing that a 600HP car as (stupidly, IMO) low as you are going is not going to be a regular driver. So the maintenance issues on suspension parts are probably not going to be a problem. But you really must make sure that however your fairly drastically modded suspension ends up, that the upper arms swing through an arc that wants to keep the inner and outer bolts parallel. If the outer end travels through an arc that makes that end's bolt want to skew away from parallel with the inner bolt, you will build up enormous binding and compressing forces in the bushes, chew them out and hate life. The suspension compliance can actually be dominated by the bush binding, not the spring rate! It may be the case that even something like the GKTech arm won't work if your suspension kinematics become too weird, courtesy of all the cut and shut going on. Although you at least say there's no binding now, so maybe you're OK. Seeing as you're in the build phase, you could consider using R33/4 type upper arms (either that actual arm, OEM or aftermarket) or any similar wishbone designed to suit your available space, so alleviate the silliness of the R32 design. Then you can locate your inner pivots to provide the correct kinematics (camber gain on compression, etc).
    • The frontend wouldn't go low enough because the coilover was max low and the upper control arm would collapse into itself and potentially bottom out in the strut tower. I made a brace and cut off the kingpin and then moved the upright down 1.25" and welded. i still have to finish but this gives an idea. Now I can have a normal 3.25" of shock travel and things aren't binding. I'm also dropping the lower arm and tie rod 1.25".
    • Motor and body mockup. Wheel fitment and ride height not set. Last pic shows front ride height after modifying the front uprights to make a 1.25" drop spindle.
    • Here's Logans Silvia with R32 Drivetrain, mine will be slightly lower (more angle). He was constantly blowing the RH axles at around 16deg. I want to avoid this.    
×
×
  • Create New...