Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I had a Autometer AF ratio meter installed not long ago. They look great and yeah there is only 3 wires that needs to be connected up (4 wires for the Cobalt series, for backlight).

When cruising, my one runs back and forth between lean and rich. It is mean to do this as the car's ECU is constantly changing the oxy voltage. However when I'm pushing it, that's when it will indicate the right volume. At 80% throttle position, that's what the manual said anyway haha

Something about the ECU being closed loop and is running the factory programed map.

It does hook up to the oxygen sensor and also if the AF ratio meter is playing up, it could be the oxygen sensor at fault and not the meter. There are 2 types of oxygen sensors and they do get wear out over time apprantely.

Hope this help a bit

Cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/18173-stoich-meter/#findComment-381743
Share on other sites

Originally posted by skylineakt

...It is mean to do this as the car's ECU is constantly changing the oxy voltage....

The ECU doesn't (directly) change the O2 sensor voltage at all. The O2 sensor actually produces its own voltage, which varies according to the amount of oxygen in the exhaust gas.

In response to the O2 sensor voltage, the ECU adjusts the fuelling to get the O2 sensor to output a voltage closer to 0.5V, which indicates stoichiometric running. The voltage coming out of the O2 sensor changes very rapidly around the stoichiometric point. Because its is an 'after the fact' adjustment, the ECU will generally overshoot the adjustment, and then needs to adjust the fuelling in the opposite direction.

So the O2 sensor, and thus the gauge, fluctuates between rich and lean.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/18173-stoich-meter/#findComment-383574
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...