Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi there fellow wagon owners,

Trying to install the TT mbc on myself and was wondering if anyone could confirm which is the turbo side connection hose and the wastegate side connection hose. Thanks for any advice.

turbotechmbcbv7.th.jpg

EDIT: pixel8r, would love it if you could take a pic of where yours is connected to in the engine bay, cheers!

Edited by webng
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/182318-turbotech-manual-boost-controller/
Share on other sites

Don't worry, i think i got it. No 5 is the wastegate actuator and No.4 is the turbo line right? So i connect 4 and 5. Can someone confirm so i at least know for sure? Cheers!

EDIT: Do i have to put a stopper on line No.2? Or leave it connected to the solenoid?

EDIT2: Do the ends where connected to the mbc need the metal bits to hold them on? Or should zip ties suffice?

Edited by webng

#1 goes to a pressure sensor for the power steering (well its on the power steering pump) so leave it there.

#4 should go to the turbo compressor for pressure sense. Just disconnect it from the other end. that goes into the bottom of the MBC (opposite the adjustment screw).

Next remove #2 completely & fit it to the wastegate actuator (where #5 is )as #5 has a couple of restrictors in it, & the other connection on your MBC.

& thats it!

Remove the rest of the pipes as they are pritty much surplus to requirement for a turbotechnics style boost controller.

Does your MBC have a little hole in the side to vent the excess pressure out of the wastegate line after the valve has closed?

Good Luck

Regards,

Jeff

Edited by Techo

Hey thanks for that.

Yeah it has the hole, i think they went back to the holey ones sometime ago.

Cheers.

#1 goes to a pressure sensor for the power steering (well its on the power steering pump) so leave it there.

#4 should go to the turbo compressor for pressure sense. Just disconnect it from the other end. that goes into the bottom of the MBC (opposite the adjustment screw).

Next remove #2 completely & fit it to the wastegate actuator (where #5 is )as #5 has a couple of restrictors in it, & the other connection on your MBC.

& thats it!

Remove the rest of the pipes as they are pritty much surplus to requirement for a turbotechnics style boost controller.

Does your MBC have a little hole in the side to vent the excess pressure out of the wastegate line after the valve has closed?

Good Luck

Regards,

Jeff

Mine has the hole as well. I previously had a JRD sport one from ebay (they look very similar) but I've gotta say the turbotech one is so much better its unbelievable. I had the old one set at 12psi but with the turbotech at 10psi I thought it was running over 14psi because it felt so much quicker. I've now put it up to 12psi and it had a few issues with pinging - since it holds 12 psi right through the rev range now whereas the old one faded off to 9psi by 6000rpm.

So I've fiddled with the SAFC settings slightly and it seems to be ok now, not optimally tuned but good enough for daily driving. I dont boost it much. And when I do it still handles it fine, just that I know it could do better...and I'm tempted just to put it back to 10psi until I get more stuff done. ;)

Good luck with the extra boost :P I found that a 1/4 turn = about 2-3 psi on mine...

Car goes into Boostworx to get head gasket fixed (long story) next Mon, then i'll have a play with the boost. More then likely to set it at 10psi for the tune and leave it at that... with the stock turbo and all.

Mine has the hole as well. I previously had a JRD sport one from ebay (they look very similar) but I've gotta say the turbotech one is so much better its unbelievable. I had the old one set at 12psi but with the turbotech at 10psi I thought it was running over 14psi because it felt so much quicker. I've now put it up to 12psi and it had a few issues with pinging - since it holds 12 psi right through the rev range now whereas the old one faded off to 9psi by 6000rpm.

So I've fiddled with the SAFC settings slightly and it seems to be ok now, not optimally tuned but good enough for daily driving. I dont boost it much. And when I do it still handles it fine, just that I know it could do better...and I'm tempted just to put it back to 10psi until I get more stuff done. ;)

Good luck with the extra boost :P I found that a 1/4 turn = about 2-3 psi on mine...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...