Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I can't stand Wiseman's. I don't like driving on a road with no lane markings, and its as choppy as all hell.

I only encountered one HWP on Pac yesterday, but that was when me and a few other sports cars were parked on the side of the road so I'm sure we were conspicuous. It was just after lunch time on a weekday though.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/184274-oldpac/page/2/#findComment-3339996
Share on other sites

If only......

The locals would bitch and moan if you did that, even if you cut them in on the fee. They were probably the biggest force behind getting Race to the Pie cancelled, even though there's no houses on that hillclimb between Mooney and Pie in the Sky.

DARN LOCALS! *shakes fist*

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/184274-oldpac/page/2/#findComment-3340072
Share on other sites

I can't stand Wiseman's. I don't like driving on a road with no lane markings, and its as choppy as all hell.

I only encountered one HWP on Pac yesterday, but that was when me and a few other sports cars were parked on the side of the road so I'm sure we were conspicuous. It was just after lunch time on a weekday though.

Yeah but they are starting to resurface wisemans according to the local council ;) Il believe it when I see it!

Yeah old pac during weekdays (well Mon - Wed @ least) is usually quiet... except in holiday times! There are only 2 HWP on duty Sunday & monday nights and not much more during the day - thats Gosford to Hawkesbury anyways..... Hornsby side can be a bit worse...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/184274-oldpac/page/2/#findComment-3340077
Share on other sites

great idea, il sign a petition for an event or regular course but good luck with legal aspects.. know of any commercial or residential requirements up there ?

doubt both being a reservation but it happens.

would require allowance for the lowest common denominator aka ambo etc.. but sounds like an awsome idea that would never be allowed. but make the price $5 for a run.. its not that long !

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/184274-oldpac/page/2/#findComment-3340628
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...